On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Stefan Negrea <snegrea(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 3:19 AM, Thomas Heute <theute(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 6:11 PM, Stefan Negrea <snegrea(a)redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I really like this last revision because the content is sectioned along
>>> the way we deliver to users. So when a user navigates the website, the
>>> content is always related to what they can directly download and use and
>>> not mixed together.
>>>
>>> I have 3 small proposals:
>>> 1) Hawkular and Overview can be combined into one Hawkular Overview or
>>> Hawkular (which has the overview of the projects).
>>>
>>
>> This is more an issue with the representation in the mindmap I think.
>> Hawkular is really the homepage:
http://www.hawkular.org/index.html and
>> I think we can remove the link since the link on the logo does the same
>> thing and it's quite a UXD standard.
>> Overview is a more detailed page:
>>
http://www.hawkular.org/docs/overview.html a user should find it's way
>> among the various projects.
>>
>
> As long as we do not have two top menu entries, one for Hawkular and one
> for Overview, then the proposal makes sense.
>
>
>>
>>
>>> 2) The Grafana plugin should be moved under Metrics because is for
>>> Metrics and only Metrics.
>>>
>>
>> The Grafana plugins works with Metrics and Services
>>
>
> But it is a Metrics specific integration, no other services will ever
> integrate with Grafana.
>
It is not Hawkular Metrics specific if it works for Hawkular Services.
That is where we will confuse everybody about the integration. Hawkular
Services has a lot services/stuff bundled. Grafana is only relevant and
works for Metrics, not Alerts, not Inventory. It does not integrate with
the other services for anything. Thinking from the perspective of a new
user, if I see the Grafana integration mentioned in the context of Hawkular
Services, then immediately I would assume that it integrates with all the
services. The context confuses everything ...
Thomas
>
>
>>
>>
>>> 3) Hawkular Server should be renamed Hawkular Services because that the
>>> official project name.
>>>
>>
>> OTOH I would not want a totally separate structure for Hawkular Services
>> *and* Hawkular Community, as they are very much the same except for some
>> installation process (have to install C* separately or not) and maybe for
>> additional parts in Community. The idea was to combined both into a single
>> concept of server.
>>
>
> Agree here, what I suggested is that Hawkular Community is just a
> subsection in the Hawkular Services; and not two different sections. That
> will give more visibility to the concept of Hawkular Services rather than
> promote the unused name of Hawkular Server .
>
>
>
>
>> Thomas
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Stefan Negrea
>>>
>>> Software Engineer
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Thomas Heute <theute(a)redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sorry, I meant to sent the PNG file... here it is
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 8:08 PM, Thomas Heute <theute(a)redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Based on that suggestion, here is another proposal.
>>>>>
>>>>> Rectangle means a page
>>>>> Underline is more likely a section on a page
>>>>> Green arrows mean links (To Travis, to gitbook.io...)
>>>>>
>>>>> Let me know what you think of that updated section
>>>>>
>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:32 PM, Stefan Negrea
<snegrea(a)redhat.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I do not see the idea proposed yet, but why not structure the
>>>>>> website around major projects? We have Hawkular community,
Hawkular
>>>>>> Services, Hawkular Metrics, and APM. Projects like Inventory or
the clients
>>>>>> would fall under Hawkular Services umbrella. So rather than
designing a
>>>>>> generic structure with everything make individual sub-sites and
then apply
>>>>>> the structure you proposed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The current website was designed when the direction of the
community
>>>>>> was different so a re-org along the previous structure is not
sufficient.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>> Stefan Negrea
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Michael Burman <
>>>>>> miburman(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Currently Heapster stores in internal memory few minutes of
data
>>>>>>> and allows queries that request this data (through its
REST-interface). The
>>>>>>> consume part will just request the data from the HWKMETRICS
instead.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Micke
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>> From: "Thomas Heute" <theute(a)redhat.com>
>>>>>>> To: "Discussions around Hawkular development" <
>>>>>>> hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 4:09:40 PM
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Hawkular-dev]
Hawkular.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Michael Burman <
>>>>>>> miburman(a)redhat.com > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Consumers is terrible word for any client, as they both
consume as
>>>>>>> well as produce the data.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well that was actually reflecting the current state, we have
>>>>>>> "things" that feed data to the server and
"things" that consume data from
>>>>>>> the server. The client libraries provide an API to feed and
consume.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For example for Heapster, we currently produce the data,
however at
>>>>>>> the moment I'm creating a change that will consume the
data from HWKMETRICS.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why does it consume data now ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Integration / clients is far more used and known word, while
>>>>>>> consumer/producer is something more specific and implies a
design pattern.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Micke
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> hawkular-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> hawkular-dev mailing list
>>>>>> hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> hawkular-dev mailing list
>>>> hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> hawkular-dev mailing list
>>> hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> hawkular-dev mailing list
>> hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev