Let me share Juca's success story, just to illustrate, how drastic the
downsizing can be:
hawkular-accounts-1.0.17.Final.war 39.99 MB
hawkular-accounts-1.0.18.Final.war 2.25 MB
Thanks, Juca!
-- P
On 2016-02-04 14:44, Juraci Paixão Kröhling wrote:
Agree :)
I was looking at the dependency:tree for the WARs generated inside
hawkular/hawkular, so, I can do some cleaning there (pinger, rest-api,
avail-creator).
- Juca.
On 04.02.2016 13:28, Peter Palaga wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> there is a couple of jars our war deployments could load from WF modules
> that are available either on a stock WF/EAP installation (apache
> commons.*, guava 18, ...) or that are our own (c* driver, guava 16).
>
> Technically, it would mean to mark those dependencies as provided and
> declare them as dependencies in jboss-deployment-structure.xml.
>
> The motivation is twofold:
>
> (1) Make clear that (if applicable) it is the container teams who is
> responsible for sustaining and productization of the jars.
>
> (2) Make the wars smaller - faster to build, faster to release/upload,
> faster to download, faster to deploy.
>
> Can anybody see a reason why we should not follow this strategy?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Peter
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev