Re: [Hawkular-dev] What should be the replacement for printlns in tests?
Le 27/01/2016 16:28, Peter Palaga a écrit :
On 2016-01-27 15:32, Jay Shaughnessy wrote:
> >
> >Yes, of course, that's the usefulness of loggers, but that doesn't mean
> >system println is worse than INFO logging in test code.
Yes, println is worse than INFO logging because there e.g. is no way how
you can pointedly turn printlns off for a given class.
> >Meaning, to the
> >point of adding checkstyle misery.
@Matt perhaps wants to say something ?:)
Checkstyle or not, I found myself adding printlns because I have not
seen a better alternative.
So there is nobody here who knows how to config the test logging with
jboss.logging?
You cannot "configure" JBoss logging, it's a logging bridge. You need to
use a backend and configure that backend. Metrics uses Logback as a backend.
The Hibernate team has done a great job putting together a JBoss logging
doc, if you're interested:
http://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/orm/5.0/topical/html/logging/Logging.html