Re: [Hawkular-dev] What should be the replacement for printlns in tests?

Just out of curiosity, i'm not against a change, but what is the reason to not have printlns, the jira just says "should not have" and doesn't state the misfortune that befalls their use. On 1/27/2016 4:44 AM, Peter Palaga wrote: > Hi *, > > Short version: How to configure the log levels for individual > jboss.logging loggers in tests run by maven outside the container? > > Long version: > I was recently assignedhttps://issues.jboss.org/browse/HAWKULAR-264 Add > println checks to the checkstyle. It says that "Tests shouldn't be > allowed to have printlns, we should enforce this via the checkstyle plugin." > > I fully agree for tests being run on the server side - those can use > JBoss Logging in the very same manner as the server code. > > However, what is the best replacement for println()s in tests that are > run outside the server? > > I tried using JBoss Logging there too but I failed completely to find a > way to configure the log levels for individual loggers. Does anybody > know how to do that? > > To get my work done without using printlns, I started to use > java.util.logging configured via logging.properties : > https://github.com/hawkular/hawkular-agent/blob/master/hawkular-wildfly-a... > > So what should be the replacement for printlns in tests? > > Thanks, > > Peter > _______________________________________________ > hawkular-dev mailing list > hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev > _______________________________________________ hawkular-dev mailing list hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev