[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-3671) The revision type field is not persisted when setting a custom revision type field name throught the properties
4:18 p.m.
The revision type field is not persisted when setting a custom revision type field name
throught the properties
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-3671
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3671
Project: Hibernate Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: envers
Reporter: Adam Warski
Assignee: Adam Warski
Fix For: 3.4
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4197239#...
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
6:06 p.m.
New subject: [Hibernate-JIRA] Commented: (HHH-3671) The revision type field is not persisted when setting a custom revision type field name throught the properties
[
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3671?page=c...
]
Mark Derricutt commented on HHH-3671:
-------------------------------------
Hi - have you been able to reproduce this at all?
The revision type field is not persisted when setting a custom
revision type field name throught the properties
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-3671
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3671
Project: Hibernate Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: envers
Reporter: Adam Warski
Assignee: Adam Warski
Fix For: 3.4
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4197239#...
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
1:14 a.m.
New subject: [Hibernate-JIRA] Commented: (HHH-3671) The revision type field is not persisted when setting a custom revision type field name throught the properties
[
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3671?page=c...
]
Adam Warski commented on HHH-3671:
----------------------------------
Hello,
no, unfortunately not. And I don't really have a clue where to look ;)
Adam
The revision type field is not persisted when setting a custom
revision type field name throught the properties
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-3671
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3671
Project: Hibernate Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: envers
Reporter: Adam Warski
Assignee: Adam Warski
Fix For: 3.4
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4197239#...
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
7:12 p.m.
New subject: [Hibernate-JIRA] Commented: (HHH-3671) The revision type field is not persisted when setting a custom revision type field name throught the properties
[
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3671?page=c...
]
Mark Derricutt commented on HHH-3671:
-------------------------------------
Hey Adam,
I just spent some time tracing the code and seeing if I could spot it, and I have - or at
least I believe so. And I believe its just a foobar on my own part (or more, our schema,
and ensuing confusion).
This all relates to our use of subclassed entities, I have two tables: party_versions, and
person_versions. party_versions is for the super class and has _revision and
_revision_type, person_versions ALSO has _revision -AND- _revision_type.
My guess is this second _revision_type column is actually redundant, which is why I never
seeing it being inserted. Looking at my party_versions table I see that _revision_type is
populated properly.
So it looks like I my schema file (generated manually) included several redundant
columns.
Can you confirm this behaviour/confusion is correct? If so - feel free to close this
ticket :)
The revision type field is not persisted when setting a custom
revision type field name throught the properties
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-3671
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3671
Project: Hibernate Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: envers
Reporter: Adam Warski
Assignee: Adam Warski
Fix For: 3.4
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4197239#...
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
3:28 p.m.
New subject: [Hibernate-JIRA] Commented: (HHH-3671) The revision type field is not persisted when setting a custom revision type field name throught the properties
[
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3671?page=c...
]
Adam Warski commented on HHH-3671:
----------------------------------
Hello,
yes, that is most probably the thing :).
You are using JOINED inheritance, right? If so, the child table only needs columns to
reference the primary key of the parent table - which constis of the revision number and
the original id. It is enough to store the revision type in the parent table.
--
Adam
The revision type field is not persisted when setting a custom
revision type field name throught the properties
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-3671
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3671
Project: Hibernate Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: envers
Reporter: Adam Warski
Assignee: Adam Warski
Fix For: 3.4
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4197239#...
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
3:28 p.m.
New subject: [Hibernate-JIRA] Resolved: (HHH-3671) The revision type field is not persisted when setting a custom revision type field name throught the properties
[
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3671?page=c...
]
Adam Warski resolved HHH-3671.
------------------------------
Resolution: Rejected
The revision type field is not persisted when setting a custom
revision type field name throught the properties
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-3671
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3671
Project: Hibernate Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: envers
Reporter: Adam Warski
Assignee: Adam Warski
Fix For: 3.4
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4197239#...
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
5827
days inactive
5847
days old
hibernate-issues@lists.jboss.org
5 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Adam Warski (JIRA) -
Mark Derricutt (JIRA)