October 2008 - hibernate-issues - Jboss List Archives

[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-2473) fetch="join" and property-ref

by David CLEMENT (JIRA)

fetch="join" and property-ref ----------------------------- Key: HHH-2473 URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2473 Project: Hibernate3 Type: Improvement Versions: 3.2.1 Environment: Version 3.2.1, not DB dependant Reporter: David CLEMENT When Hibernate does a fetch join with a property-ref in a many-to-one, it issues the join SQL query but needs another select to find the associated entity by property-ref. It should be able to use the entity fetched in the join instead (maybe this has been done to ensure the unicity of the associated entity, but it introduce a performance issue). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators.... - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 4 months

8
9
0 / 0

[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-2596) Add support for Hypersonic 1.8.0.7

by Gail Badner (JIRA)

Add support for Hypersonic 1.8.0.7 ---------------------------------- Key: HHH-2596 URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2596 Project: Hibernate3 Issue Type: Improvement Components: core Affects Versions: 3.2.3 Environment: Hibernate 3.2.3, Hypersonic 1.8.0.7 Reporter: Gail Badner The version released with Hibernate 3.2.3 (1.8.0.2) is from 2005. It would be good to move to a more recent version. The following unit tests fail when using Hypersonic 1.8.0.7: org.hibernate.test.jpa.lock.JPALockTest.testLockModeTypeRead: Failure: isolation not maintained expected:<lock test> but was:<updated> org.hibernate.test.legacy.IJ2Test.testUnionSubclass: Error: could not set a field value by reflection setter of org.hibernate.test.legacy.J.amount org.hibernate.test.subclassfilter.UnionSubclassFilterTest.testFiltersWithUnionSubclass: Error: Could not execute JDBC batch update org.hibernate.test.unionsubclass.UnionSubclassTest.testUnionSubclass: Failure: junit.framework.AssertionFailedError org.hibernate.test.unionsubclass.UnionSubclassTest.testUnionSubclassManyToOne Error: attempt to create delete event with null entity -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators.... - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 4 months

2
3
0 / 0

[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HSEARCH-76) Lazy loaded property isn't indexed properly

by Christian Bauer (JIRA)

Lazy loaded property isn't indexed properly ------------------------------------------- Key: HSEARCH-76 URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HSEARCH-76 Project: Hibernate Search Issue Type: Bug Components: engine Affects Versions: 3.0.0.beta3 Reporter: Christian Bauer @Column(name = "CONTENT") @Length(min = 0, max = 32768) @Basic(fetch = FetchType.LAZY) // Lazy loaded through bytecode instrumentation @org.hibernate.search.annotations.Field(index = org.hibernate.search.annotations.Index.TOKENIZED) private String content; I use fulltextSession.index(o) and I only get two terms indexed "text" and "edit". I don't know where these are coming from actually, no object has these content values. If I trigger an o.getContent() before fulltextSession.index(o), the content is loaded with sequential selects for the lazy property and correctly indexed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators.... - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 4 months

4
9
0 / 0

[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HSEARCH-121) Should optimize set batch to true (for indexWriters)?

by Emmanuel Bernard (JIRA)

Should optimize set batch to true (for indexWriters)? ----------------------------------------------------- Key: HSEARCH-121 URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HSEARCH-121 Project: Hibernate Search Issue Type: Bug Components: documentation, engine Reporter: Emmanuel Bernard -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators.... - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 4 months

4
14
0 / 0

[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-3538) Unnecessary complete select fragment for all associations

by Hauke Rabe (JIRA)

Unnecessary complete select fragment for all associations --------------------------------------------------------- Key: HHH-3538 URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3538 Project: Hibernate Core Issue Type: Bug Components: query-criteria Affects Versions: 3.3.1 Reporter: Hauke Rabe The JoinWalker creates for all given associations a select fragment. An associations should have a flag, if it is necessary to be included on the select fragment. If you need an association only for a specific where fragment why should it be fetched? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators.... - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 5 months

5
25
0 / 0

[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-2578) redesign SessionFactory building

by Steve Ebersole (JIRA)

redesign SessionFactory building -------------------------------- Key: HHH-2578 URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2578 Project: Hibernate3 Issue Type: Improvement Components: core Reporter: Steve Ebersole Assignee: Steve Ebersole Priority: Critical Fix For: cfg-rework Currently a SessionFactory is built by throwing a bunch of stuff into a Configuration object, stirring it, letting it come to a boil, and then pulling out the SessionFactory. In seriousness, there are a few problems with the way we currently operate within a Configuration and how we use it to build a SessionFactory: The general issue that there is no "lifecycle" to when various pieces of information will be available. This is an important omission in a number of ways: 1) consider schema generation. currently we cannot even know the dialect when a lot of db object names are being determined. this would be nice because it would allow us to transparently handle table/column names which are also keywords/reserved-words in the dialect, for example. 2) static-ness of types and the type-mappings. Because we currently have nothing to which to scope them. Ideally a type instance would be aware of the SessionFactory to which it is bound. Instead, what we have now is to change API methods quite a lot of the time to add in the SessionFactory as a passed parameter whenever it is discovered that it is needed. 3) also, most (all?) of the "static" configuration parameters in Hibernate are currently required to be so because of their use from within these static types; thus scoping types would allow us to also scope those config parameters (things like bytecode-provider, use of binary streams, etc). Ideally what I see happening is a scheme where users build a org.hibernate.cfg.Settings (or something similiar) instance themselves. Additionally they would apply metadata to a registry of some sort (lets call it MetadataRegistry for now). Then in order to build a SessionFactory, they would supply these two pieces of information (via ctor? via builder?). The important aspect though is that the information in MetadataRegistry would not be dealt with until that point in time, which would allow us to guarentee that resolving schema object names, types, etc would have access to the runtime Settings (and specifically the dialect) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators.... - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 5 months

3
14
0 / 0

[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-2931) Criteria.setMaxResults() filters children with fetch="join"

by Mattias Jiderhamn (JIRA)

Criteria.setMaxResults() filters children with fetch="join" ----------------------------------------------------------- Key: HHH-2931 URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2931 Project: Hibernate3 Issue Type: Bug Components: query-criteria Affects Versions: 3.2.5 Reporter: Mattias Jiderhamn Assume class Parent with a collection of children that is mapped with fetch="join", then use a Criteria to find a specific Parent using setMaxResults(1).uniqueResult(). The child collection of the returned Parent will only hold 1 element, despite how many actual matching rows the child table has in the databasen. In this case, the fetch="join" needs to be ignored, and a separate query needs to be issued to fetch the children. This issue may very well be related to HHH-2049. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators.... - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 5 months

2
1
0 / 0

[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-2544) Create the EntityPersisters in order based on Inheritance hierarchy

by Shawn Clowater (JIRA)

Create the EntityPersisters in order based on Inheritance hierarchy ------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HHH-2544 URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2544 Project: Hibernate3 Issue Type: New Feature Components: core Affects Versions: 3.2.3 Reporter: Shawn Clowater Priority: Minor I have a bit of what might seem to be an odd request. I had run into a scenario where filters on my mappings that were part of a Single Table hierarchy were not getting into the configuration and it turned out it was based on the order that the EntityPersisters were being created as we've doing some minor magic with Custom EntityPersisters for filters. In our case we have a filter template where the filter is pretty much the same for each class that implements it except for the table and key name used in the filter. So, rather than define this annotation everywhere (we had previously been using xdoclet to generate it for the hbm mappings) we pushed the logic into a Custom Persister. So, essentially as it is building the EntityPersister we intercept the PersistentClass before it calls the super() constructor and add our required filters on the PersistantClass (in its FilterMap) before it gets passed up. This is done like this because by the time it gets to the AbstractEntityPersister's constructor it uses the filterMap to construct the FilterHelper and then you're done as you have no access to change that after it is built. So, in the Inheritance case any subclasses that are built before the main root class will not have the filters that we inject during the construction of our Custom Entity Persisters. I have temporarily worked around it by changing the Subclasses getFilterMap() method to not only return the filters from the Parent class but also from the class itself. Now, normally you can't define the filter on the subclass but I can through the persister. What I'd like to do is: Make the persister class for the subclasses a 'standard' persister that doesn't add any filters to the subclass. Still have my root class' entity persister adding the filters. But have the Entity Persisters built in hierarchal order in the SessionFactoryImpl. Since they are being built in any given order right now, I can't see an issue with providing some order to them, something like the AnnotationBinder does. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators.... - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 5 months

1
2
0 / 0

[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-2579) scope bytecode provider selection to session factory

by Steve Ebersole (JIRA)

scope bytecode provider selection to session factory ---------------------------------------------------- Key: HHH-2579 URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2579 Project: Hibernate3 Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Steve Ebersole Assignee: Steve Ebersole Fix For: cfg-rework currently this is one of those "static" config params (classloader wide). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators.... - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 5 months

1
5
0 / 0

[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-3574) ANY mapping ignores lazy="false"

by Manuel Dominguez Sarmiento (JIRA)

ANY mapping ignores lazy="false" -------------------------------- Key: HHH-3574 URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3574 Project: Hibernate Core Issue Type: Bug Components: core Affects Versions: 3.3.1 Reporter: Manuel Dominguez Sarmiento We have a use case for eager fetching of an <any> association. The DTD accepts lazy="false|true", however at runtime it doesn't make any difference. Digging deeper, we see that org.hibernate.mapping.Any does not have a lazy property, furthermore, it does not extend Fetchable. This explains why it will not work as expected. There are two possible resolutions: 1) Implement eager fetching for <any> associations, unless there is some technical difficulty in doing so. Of course lazy fetching won't be possible using joins because of the nature of this type of associations, however it should be simple enough with a second select. This means that the XML config should handle lazy="false|true" but not fetch="join|select|subselect|etc" 2) Fix the DTD in case this can't be done to avoid confusion (less desirable). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators.... - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 5 months

2
1
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

hibernate-issues October 2008