[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (EJB-364) Composite PK and @GeneratedValue
by Radosław Smogura (JIRA)
Composite PK and @GeneratedValue
--------------------------------
Key: EJB-364
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/EJB-364
Project: Hibernate Entity Manager
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 3.3.2.GA
Environment: Hibernate 3.2.6
Glassfish
PostgreSQL
Reporter: Radosław Smogura
Priority: Critical
[code]
For class like this
@Entity
@IdClass(FooId.class)
/* Seq / Table generator */
public class Foo {
int id1;
int id2;
@Id
public getId1() {
return id1;
}
public setId1(....);
@Id
@GeneratedValue(strategy=AUTO/IDENTITY/SEQUENCE/TABLE)
public int getId2() {
return id2;
}
public void setId2(.....);
}
[/code]
Id1 is set manully, but id2 is unchanged i this situation hibernate doesn't generates PK and tries to insert NULL causing error.
Specification requires assigning of generated value with @Id properties. Part 2.4.1 defines two types of PKs simple and composite and part 9.1.9 says about PKs in generally. (SEQ or IDENTITY is specification depended, but PostgreSQL support it and Hibernate should support it too).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
14 years, 4 months
[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-3028) Memory consumption when query cache is enabled
by Markus Heiden (JIRA)
Memory consumption when query cache is enabled
----------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-3028
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3028
Project: Hibernate3
Issue Type: Bug
Components: caching (L2), core
Affects Versions: 3.2.5
Environment: Hibernate 3.2.5, Oracle 9i
Reporter: Markus Heiden
As discussed in the hibernate-dev mailing list from 9.11.2007 to 12.11.2007 this bug describes a memory consumption issue which is located in ActionQueue/EntityAction.
Some snippets from ActionQueue:
private ArrayList executions;
public void execute(Executable executable) {
final boolean lockQueryCache = session.getFactory().getSettings().isQueryCacheEnabled();
if ( executable.hasAfterTransactionCompletion() || lockQueryCache ) {
executions.add( executable );
}
...
}
This code leads to a kind of memory leak, because if the "executable" is added to "executions", the related entity which is referenced from the "executable" is prevented from being garbage collected until the transaction ends. So if one needs to insert large amounts of transient objects in one transaction, there is no chance to get rid of the inserted objects by flushing and evicting them, if e.g. the query cache is enabled.
One solution to this problem might be to rework the above "if" condition to only add objects to "executions" if this is really needed. The problem is to determine when it is really needed.
Some snippets from EntityAction (which implements Executable):
private final Object instance;
public final Serializable getId() {
if ( id instanceof DelayedPostInsertIdentifier ) {
return session.getPersistenceContext().getEntry( instance ).getId();
}
return id;
}
public final Object getInstance() {
return instance;
}
Another solution might be to set the reference to the related entity (field "instance" in EntityAction) to null after flushing. This does not prevent "executions" from being filled, but the related entities might be garbage collected and so the memory consumption is acceptable. The problem is that subclasses of EntityAction use the "instance" field for post transaction work.
The are currently two workarounds to this problems:
1) To always disable the query cache
2) To use shorter transactions
Workaround 1 is not really acceptable, because it prohibits the use of a very useful feature.
Workaround 2 is sometimes acceptable but not wanted in most cases, because it breaks transactional safety.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
14 years, 4 months
[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-3305) hbm2ddl: MS SQL Server 2005 defaults to Clustered Index on PK, lets use PRIMARY KEY NONCLUSTERED for hbm2ddl as a more reasonable default
by Jim Doyle (JIRA)
hbm2ddl: MS SQL Server 2005 defaults to Clustered Index on PK, lets use PRIMARY KEY NONCLUSTERED for hbm2ddl as a more reasonable default
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-3305
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3305
Project: Hibernate3
Issue Type: Bug
Components: metamodel
Affects Versions: 3.2.1
Reporter: Jim Doyle
In SQL Server 2005, PRIMARY KEY defaults to creating a Clustered Index for the PK column at table creation time.
To confirm this behaviour Please see: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms188066.aspx
This default behaviour is un-desireable for a number of reasons:
1. No other databases default to a clustered IDX at the PK ; Not DB2, nor Oracle nor MySQL
2. There may only be ONE clustered IDX per table. By using this as a default makes it difficult
for the app developer or DBA to quickly add or change the once-per-table opportunity to use
the cluster to improve query performance.
3. The default cluster index that Microsoft applies seems only to benefit naive SQL server users with
little to no DBA skills. Table insert of new rows onto a Clustered Index PK is always very fast and
while this optimization may be impressive if your problem space is rapidly inserting new data into large tables,
this optimization is often an antipattern to users with more plausible query patterns such as scan by non-primary
key date, numeric amounts or alphabetical data.
4. Defaulting the PK to clustered creates SUBSTANTIAL burden for a DBA when the Clustered Index needs to be removed
from the PK to be deployed on other columns on the table. As an example of the burden that this creates, for EACH TABLE
one must:
- Discover all tables and columns that link back to the table in question through FOREIGN KEY
- Drop all foreign keys
- Drop the PK
- Add the PK back, with NONCLUSTERED
- Put back all the dropped Foreign keys
5. Additional arguments against supporting Microsoft's unusual default is given here:
http://tonesdotnetblog.wordpress.com/2008/05/26/twelve-tips-for-optimisin...
(Please See Section 2: Use Clustered Index).
I propose ANY ONE of the following enhancements to the DDL generator for the SQL Server 2005 Dialect:
1. Change the generated SQL from colname coltype PRIMARY KEY TO colname coltype PRIMARY KEY NONCLUSTERED such that
PK index generate conforms the the usual, sensible defaults of other database products.
2. Use a Properties attribute (i.e. hibernate.hbm2ddl.dialect.mssql.use_non_clustered_pk) that is evaluated at hbm2ddl runtime
that will emit 'NONCLUSTERED' to the PK clause. If this Property is not defined, the hbm2ddl will simply emit PRIMARY KEY as it does
now and MS SQL Server will use its peculiar and annoying default.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
14 years, 4 months
[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-2449) Lazy loading for one-to-one asociations
by jose (JIRA)
Lazy loading for one-to-one asociations
---------------------------------------
Key: HHH-2449
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2449
Project: Hibernate3
Type: New Feature
Components: core
Versions: 3.2.2
Environment: Hibernate 3.2.2
Reporter: jose
After read "Some explanations on lazy loading" and my tests I found a lossing feature in Hibernate (3.2.2).
one-to-one with lazy="proxy"_____________________________________________
Hibernate ALWAYS launch selects to know if one-to-one is null or can be proxied.
one-to-one with lazy="no-proxy"__________________________________________
Instrumentation allows to hibernate modify the getter to allows lazy loading on demand:
* but allways initialize ALL no-proxy relations (with first getter call)
-> must initialize ONLY the requested property
* never auto-initialize FETCH joins, ALWAYS doit on demand (if opened session)
-> must auto-initialize ONLY the FETCHED property
note: Can submit a fix for this? How?
NEW FEATURE: one-to-one with lazy="proxy" without multiple SELECTS______
If Hibernate adds join, for all one-to-one relations, to get the foreign-key of other tables, can check it to create a proxy or null.
note: that hibernate adds joins for hierarchy, why not for one-to-one relations?
This solution avoids:
* 'multiple subselects' after first select
* 'instrumentation' of bytecode
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
14 years, 5 months
[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-3029) use_sql_commants fails on Derby
by Oleksandr Alesinskyy (JIRA)
use_sql_commants fails on Derby
-------------------------------
Key: HHH-3029
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3029
Project: Hibernate3
Issue Type: Bug
Environment: WinXP, SP2 Java 1.5..0_12, Spring 2.0.7, Hibernate 3.2.5ga, Derby 10.3.2.1
Reporter: Oleksandr Alesinskyy
Activation is use_sql_comments cause SQL exception
/* insert de.ntec.lms.impl.P1Bean
*/ insert
into
P1
(VERSION, CELL_POS, CODE, CELL_ID, PLACE_ID)
values
(?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
2007-12-25 11:46:29,406 WARN org.hibernate.util.JDBCExceptionReporter
SQL Error: -1, SQLState: 42X01
2007-12-25 11:46:29,406 ERROR org.hibernate.util.JDBCExceptionReporter
Syntaxfehler: Encountered "/" at line 1, column 1.
2007-12-25 11:46:29,487 ERROR org.hibernate.event.def.AbstractFlushingEventListener
Could not synchronize database state with session
org.hibernate.exception.SQLGrammarException: could not insert: [de.ntec.lms.impl.P1Bean]
at org.hibernate.exception.SQLStateConverter.convert(SQLStateConverter.java:67)
at org.hibernate.exception.JDBCExceptionHelper.convert(JDBCExceptionHelper.java:43)
at org.hibernate.persister.entity.AbstractEntityPersister.insert(AbstractEntityPersister.java:2078)
at org.hibernate.persister.entity.AbstractEntityPersister.insert(AbstractEntityPersister.java:2427)
at org.hibernate.action.EntityInsertAction.execute(EntityInsertAction.java:51)
at org.hibernate.engine.ActionQueue.execute(ActionQueue.java:248)
at org.hibernate.engine.ActionQueue.executeActions(ActionQueue.java:232)
at org.hibernate.engine.ActionQueue.executeActions(ActionQueue.java:139)
at org.hibernate.event.def.AbstractFlushingEventListener.performExecutions(AbstractFlushingEventListener.java:297)
at org.hibernate.event.def.DefaultFlushEventListener.onFlush(DefaultFlushEventListener.java:27)
at org.hibernate.impl.SessionImpl.flush(SessionImpl.java:985)
at org.hibernate.impl.SessionImpl.managedFlush(SessionImpl.java:333)
at org.hibernate.transaction.JDBCTransaction.commit(JDBCTransaction.java:106)
at de.ntec.lms.impl.PerformanceTest.doMain(PerformanceTest.java:84)
at de.ntec.lms.impl.PerformanceTest.main(PerformanceTest.java:46)
Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: Syntaxfehler: Encountered "/" at line 1, column 1.
at org.apache.derby.client.am.SQLExceptionFactory.getSQLException(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.derby.client.am.SqlException.getSQLException(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.derby.client.am.Connection.prepareStatement(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.commons.dbcp.DelegatingConnection.prepareStatement(DelegatingConnection.java:185)
at org.apache.commons.dbcp.PoolingDataSource$PoolGuardConnectionWrapper.prepareStatement(PoolingDataSource.java:278)
at org.hibernate.jdbc.AbstractBatcher.getPreparedStatement(AbstractBatcher.java:442)
at org.hibernate.jdbc.AbstractBatcher.prepareStatement(AbstractBatcher.java:93)
at org.hibernate.jdbc.AbstractBatcher.prepareStatement(AbstractBatcher.java:86)
at org.hibernate.jdbc.AbstractBatcher.prepareBatchStatement(AbstractBatcher.java:171)
at org.hibernate.persister.entity.AbstractEntityPersister.insert(AbstractEntityPersister.java:2048)
... 12 more
Caused by: org.apache.derby.client.am.SqlException: Syntaxfehler: Encountered "/" at line 1, column 1.
at org.apache.derby.client.am.Statement.completeSqlca(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.derby.client.net.NetStatementReply.parsePrepareError(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.derby.client.net.NetStatementReply.parsePRPSQLSTTreply(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.derby.client.net.NetStatementReply.readPrepareDescribeOutput(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.derby.client.net.StatementReply.readPrepareDescribeOutput(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.derby.client.net.NetStatement.readPrepareDescribeOutput_(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.derby.client.am.Statement.readPrepareDescribeOutput(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.derby.client.am.PreparedStatement.readPrepareDescribeInputOutput(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.derby.client.am.PreparedStatement.flowPrepareDescribeInputOutput(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.derby.client.am.PreparedStatement.prepare(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.derby.client.am.Connection.prepareStatementX(Unknown Source)
... 20 more
Hibernate settings (via Spring)
<property name="manglableMappingResources">
<list>
<value>de/ntec/lms/impl/P1Bean.hbm.xml</value>
</list>
</property>
<property name="hibernateProperties">
<props>
<prop key="hibernate.dialect">org.hibernate.dialect.DerbyDialect</prop>
<prop key="hibernate.show_sql">true</prop>
<prop key="hibernate.format_sql">true</prop>
<prop key="hibernate.use_sql_comments">true</prop>
<prop key="hibernate.cglib.use_reflection_optimizer">false</prop>
</props>
</property>
When use_sql_comments is false all works smoothly.
Failing code
P1Bean p1= new P1Bean();
p1.setCell(1);
p1.setCellPosition(2);
p1.setCode("A");
s.save(p1);
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
14 years, 5 months