]
Hardy Ferentschik commented on HSEARCH-960:
-------------------------------------------
I maybe can understand the use case of using _Index.TOKENIZED_ and _Index.UN_TOKENIZED_
for the same field name, but what if you take the other indexing options into account as
well.
I am also interested in the actual use case. Is the idea to write a query which targets
only one field?
Index.UN_TOKENIZED overrides other tokenized fields that share the
same name
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: HSEARCH-960
URL:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HSEARCH-960
Project: Hibernate Search
Issue Type: Bug
Components: mapping
Affects Versions: 3.4.0.Final
Environment: 3.4.0 Final
Reporter: John-Michael Au
Labels: annotations, bug, override, tokenized, un_tokenized
Fix For: 3.4.2, 4.0.0.CR2
Marking one field as un-tokenized causes all other fields with the same names to be
un-tokenized.
i.e.
{code}
@Field(name = "simple_search", index = Index.UN_TOKENIZED, store = Store.NO)
private String string;
@Field(name = "simple_search", index = Index.TOKENIZED, store = Store.NO)
private String string2;
{code}
The resulting behaviour is that "simple_search" will be made up of un-tokenized
'string' and 'string2' values, even though 'string2' was specified
to be tokenized.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: