]
Gunnar Morling commented on BVAL-198:
-------------------------------------
Must have.
Simplify creation of ConstraintViolationExceptions
--------------------------------------------------
Key: BVAL-198
URL:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/BVAL-198
Project: Bean Validation
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: spec-general
Affects Versions: 1.0 final
Reporter: Gunnar Morling
Attachments: bval-198.diff
javax.validation.ConstraintViolationException wraps a set of constraint violations,
currently in the following form:
Set<ConstraintViolation<?>> constraintViolations
As the exception's constructors have a parameter of the same type, instantiating it
is not as easy as expected:
Validator validator = ...;
DomainObject domainObject = new DomainObject();
Set<ConstraintViolation<DomainObject>> constraintViolations =
validator.validate(domainObject);
//compiler error: ("The constructor
ConstraintViolationException(Set<ConstraintViolation<DomainObject>>) is
undefined")
throw new ConstraintViolationException(constraintViolations);
//this works
throw new ConstraintViolationException(new
HashSet<ConstraintViolation<?>>(constraintViolations));
This problem can be solved by changing the collection type to
Set<? extends ConstraintViolation<?>>
The exception then would read as follows:
public class ConstraintViolationException extends ValidationException {
private final Set<? extends ConstraintViolation<?>> constraintViolations;
public ConstraintViolationException(String message, Set<? extends
ConstraintViolation<?>> constraintViolations) {
super( message );
this.constraintViolations = constraintViolations;
}
public ConstraintViolationException(Set<? extends ConstraintViolation<?>>
constraintViolations) {
super();
this.constraintViolations = constraintViolations;
}
public Set<ConstraintViolation<?>> getConstraintViolations() {
return new HashSet<ConstraintViolation<?>>(constraintViolations);
}
}
This makes the exception easier to use for producers, while maintaining simplicity for
clients (since getConstraintViolations() still returns a
Set<ConstraintViolation<?>>, clients don't have to do deal with the bound
wildcard expression).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: