Rethink the group sequence inheritance rules -------------------------------------------- Key: BVAL-59 URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/BVAL-59 Project: Bean Validation Issue Type: Improvement Components: spec-general Reporter: Emmanuel Bernard Sebastian wrote: 3-F) 3.4 "Two group sequences must not share the same group name in a given object graph". Does this mean If an object of type A references an object of type B and A and B have a group sequences with the same name this would result to an exception? Why would such a limitation be necessary? Or is the term "object graph" misplaced here? Emmanuel replied: "When an object graph is validated (through the use of @Valid), the children elements of the graph inherit the sequence definitions of their parent." Yes this was the intend. Because group sequence definitions are inherited from a parent to a child, the rule makes sense. I think you assumed that a group sequence was not inherited. Children would be validated against the expanded groups of their parents. Let's go back to the drawing board (in a different thread) and evaluate the merit of both rules using common usecases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators.... - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira