cache.lock should work within the scope of batching --------------------------------------------------- Key: ISPN-3077 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3077 Project: Infinispan Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 5.2.6.Final Reporter: Mircea Markus Assignee: Mircea Markus Fix For: 5.3.0.Beta2, 5.3.0.Final {code:java} cache.getAdvancedCache().startBatch(); cache.lock("k"); ... cache.endBatch(..); {code} The code above throws an exception: {quote} java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Cannot create a transactional context without a valid Transaction instance. at org.infinispan.context.TransactionalInvocationContextContainer.createInvocationContext(TransactionalInvocationContextContainer.java:113) at org.infinispan.context.TransactionalInvocationContextContainer.createInvocationContext(TransactionalInvocationContextContainer.java:108) at org.infinispan.CacheImpl.getInvocationContextForWrite(CacheImpl.java:471) at org.infinispan.CacheImpl.lock(CacheImpl.java:568) at org.infinispan.CacheImpl.lock(CacheImpl.java:553) at org.infinispan.api.batch.LockInBatchTest.testLockWithBatching(LockInBatchTest.java:47) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.testng.internal.MethodInvocationHelper.invokeMethod(MethodInvocationHelper.java:80) at org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeMethod(Invoker.java:714) at org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeTestMethod(Invoker.java:901) at org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeTestMethods(Invoker.java:1231) at org.testng.internal.TestMethodWorker.invokeTestMethods(TestMethodWorker.java:127) at org.testng.internal.TestMethodWorker.run(TestMethodWorker.java:111) at org.testng.TestRunner.privateRun(TestRunner.java:767) at org.testng.TestRunner.run(TestRunner.java:617) at org.testng.SuiteRunner.runTest(SuiteRunner.java:334) at org.testng.SuiteRunner.access$000(SuiteRunner.java:37) at org.testng.SuiteRunner$SuiteWorker.run(SuiteRunner.java:368) at org.testng.internal.thread.ThreadUtil$2.call(ThreadUtil.java:64) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:303) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:138) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:680) {quote} This logic should be supported, as batching is a convenient way for using transactions without the burden of configuring a transaction manager.