February 2011 - infinispan-issues

[JBoss JIRA] Work started: (ISPN-186) Smart L1 cache invalidation

by Pete Muir (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ] Work on ISPN-186 started by Pete Muir. > Smart L1 cache invalidation > --------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-186 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-186 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Distributed Cache > Reporter: Manik Surtani > Assignee: Pete Muir > Labels: l1 > Fix For: 5.0.0.BETA1, 5.0.0.Final > > > Need to build a mechanism in which L1 invalidation is NOT multicast, but instead is unicast _if necessary_ to specific nodes that may have cached a given entry. This can be detected by maintaining a list of nodes who have requested a key via a remote get, but this would need to be relayed by all data owners. > Benefits would be performance by removing unnecessary invalidation where this is not needed, and by reducing noise in network stacks of most nodes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (ISPN-493) Harden rehash leave process

by Vladimir Blagojevic (JIRA)

Harden rehash leave process --------------------------- Key: ISPN-493 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-493 Project: Infinispan Issue Type: Task Affects Versions: 4.1.0.BETA2, 4.0.0.Final Reporter: Vladimir Blagojevic Assignee: Vladimir Blagojevic Fix For: 5.0.0.BETA1, 5.0.0.Final We need to make sure that leave rehash process properly handles massive and rapid node failure. Massive failures: JGroups detects multiple node failures and pushes up to Infinispan views that are more "volatile" than we currently assumed (only one member at the time can leave). For example, if we have view V1={A,B,C,D,E} and massive failure causes {C,D,E} to fail, JGroups failure detection and GMS are going to install a view V2={A,B} to surviving members. LeaveTask does not handle this scenario. Rapid node failure: We need to revisit how LeaveTasks are queued up and executed/canceled during rapid node failures. Do we always cancel currently running leave tasks? At what stage are we allowed to cancel it and at what stage of a leave tasks is it better to wait for a completion of a task. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 2 months

3
6
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (ISPN-902) Data consistency across rehashing

by Erik Salter (JIRA)

Data consistency across rehashing --------------------------------- Key: ISPN-902 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-902 Project: Infinispan Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Erik Salter Assignee: Manik Surtani Priority: Critical Attachments: cacheTest.zip There are two scenarios we're seeing on rehashing, both of which are critical. 1. On a node leaving a running cluster, we're seeing an inordinate amount of timeout errors, such as the one below. The end result of this is that the cluster ends up losing data. org.infinispan.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Timed out waiting for valid responses! at org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.JGroupsTransport.invokeRemotely(JGroupsTransport.java:417) at org.infinispan.remoting.rpc.RpcManagerImpl.invokeRemotely(RpcManagerImpl.java:101) at org.infinispan.distribution.DistributionManagerImpl.retrieveFromRemoteSource(DistributionManagerImpl.java:341) at org.infinispan.interceptors.DistributionInterceptor.realRemoteGet(DistributionInterceptor.java:143) at org.infinispan.interceptors.DistributionInterceptor.remoteGetAndStoreInL1(DistributionInterceptor.java:131) 06:07:44,097 WARN [GMS] cms-node-20192: merge leader did not get data from all partition coordinators [cms-node-20192, mydht1-18445], merge is cancelled at org.infinispan.commands.read.GetKeyValueCommand.acceptVisitor(GetKeyValueCommand.java:59) 2. Joining a node into a running cluster causes transactional failures on the other nodes. Most of the time, depending on the load, a node can take upwards of 8 minutes to join. I've attached a unit test that can reproduce these issues. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 2 months

3
8
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (ISPN-914) RehashTask should not block on invalidating migrated entries

by Manik Surtani (JIRA)

RehashTask should not block on invalidating migrated entries ------------------------------------------------------------ Key: ISPN-914 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-914 Project: Infinispan Issue Type: Bug Components: Distributed Cache Affects Versions: 4.2.0.Final Reporter: Manik Surtani Assignee: Manik Surtani Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.2.1.Final See user forum thread for details. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 2 months

3
4
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (ISPN-931) NPE in /infinispan-gridfs-webdav demo

by Radoslav Husar (JIRA)

NPE in /infinispan-gridfs-webdav demo ------------------------------------- Key: ISPN-931 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-931 Project: Infinispan Issue Type: Bug Components: Demos and Tutorials Affects Versions: 4.2.1.CR1 Reporter: Radoslav Husar Assignee: Manik Surtani Priority: Minor We ran into this when we were demoing gridFS webdav demo on the developer conference using Gnome's 'Connect to server' function and then accessing via Nautilus. Looks like error in webdav 3rd party lib. 14:57:07,790 ERROR [WebDavServletBean] Exception: java.lang.NullPointerException at net.sf.webdav.methods.DoPropfind.parseProperties(DoPropfind.java:256) at net.sf.webdav.methods.DoPropfind.recursiveParseProperties(DoPropfind.java:212) at net.sf.webdav.methods.DoPropfind.recursiveParseProperties(DoPropfind.java:227) at net.sf.webdav.methods.DoPropfind.execute(DoPropfind.java:165) at net.sf.webdav.WebDavServletBean.service(WebDavServletBean.java:128) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:717) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:290) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206) at org.jboss.web.tomcat.filters.ReplyHeaderFilter.doFilter(ReplyHeaderFilter.java:96) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:235) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:235) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:191) at org.jboss.web.tomcat.security.SecurityAssociationValve.invoke(SecurityAssociationValve.java:190) at org.jboss.web.tomcat.security.JaccContextValve.invoke(JaccContextValve.java:92) at org.jboss.web.tomcat.security.SecurityContextEstablishmentValve.process(SecurityContextEstablishmentValve.java:126) at org.jboss.web.tomcat.security.SecurityContextEstablishmentValve.invoke(SecurityContextEstablishmentValve.java:70) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:127) at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:102) at org.jboss.web.tomcat.service.jca.CachedConnectionValve.invoke(CachedConnectionValve.java:158) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:109) at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:330) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:829) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:598) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker.run(JIoEndpoint.java:447) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662) Before happening, I noticed (maybe unrelated..) 14:42:31,269 INFO [STDOUT] LockedObject.removeLockedObjectOwner() 14:42:31,269 INFO [STDOUT] java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 1 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 2 months

2
12
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (ISPN-930) race condition in Lock reordering could cause Lucene Index corruption when a CacheLoader is enabled

by Sanne Grinovero (JIRA)

race condition in Lock reordering could cause Lucene Index corruption when a CacheLoader is enabled --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: ISPN-930 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-930 Project: Infinispan Issue Type: Bug Components: Lucene Directory Affects Versions: 5.0.0.ALPHA2, 4.2.1.CR1, 4.2.0.Final Reporter: Sanne Grinovero Assignee: Sanne Grinovero Fix For: 4.2.1.Final, 5.0.0.ALPHA3 This is related to ISPN-575; the Lucene Directory used to be able to workaround the issue but this doesn't seem to be the case anymore: org.infinispan.lucene.profiling.CacheStoreStressTest fails on both master and 4.2.x branches. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 2 months

2
3
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (ISPN-921) REST server war deployment problem for standalone REST server

by Michal Linhard (JIRA)

REST server war deployment problem for standalone REST server ------------------------------------------------------------- Key: ISPN-921 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-921 Project: Infinispan Issue Type: Bug Components: Cache Server Affects Versions: 4.2.1.CR1 Reporter: Michal Linhard Assignee: Manik Surtani When running standalone infinispan REST server (only the REST server creates the DefaultCacheManager) the method org.infinispan.rest.StartupListener.getMcInjectedCacheManager() fails and results in an ERROR log message org.jboss.kernel.spi.registry.KernelRegistryEntryNotFoundException: Entry not found with name: DefaultCacheManager at org.jboss.kernel.plugins.registry.AbstractKernelRegistry.getEntry(AbstractKernelRegistry.java:96) the problem is that the method org.jboss.kernel.spi.registry.KernelRegistry.getEntry invoked via reflection doesn't return null when an entry isn't found but rather throws KernelRegistryEntryNotFoundException which is not handled by the code in getMcInjectedCacheManager() -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 2 months

4
10
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (ISPN-929) All example/demos should have JMX stats enabled

by Galder Zamarreño (JIRA)

All example/demos should have JMX stats enabled ----------------------------------------------- Key: ISPN-929 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-929 Project: Infinispan Issue Type: Task Components: Demos and Tutorials, JMX, reporting and management Reporter: Galder Zamarreño Assignee: Galder Zamarreño Fix For: 4.2.1.Final, 5.0.0.ALPHA3, 5.0.0.Final All demos should have global and cache level JMX statistics enabled. Firstly, it helps users view the stats without the need of extra tweaking. Secondly, it makes life easier for me or QA for when we wanna tests these demos with the RHQ/JOPR. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 2 months

2
5
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (ISPN-927) Cache inserts inside a transaction are not propagated across the cluster in distributed mode

by Sudheer Krishna (JIRA)

Cache inserts inside a transaction are not propagated across the cluster in distributed mode -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: ISPN-927 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-927 Project: Infinispan Issue Type: Bug Components: Distributed Cache Affects Versions: 4.2.0.Final Environment: Tested in windows Reporter: Sudheer Krishna Assignee: Manik Surtani Attachments: cache -framework.rar, testcase.rar, transaction-framework.rar When I try to use transactions and in distributed mode (mode=dist) , changes made inside the transaction in one node is not reflected in the another node. when i change mode to replication everything works fine. So i assume this is a bug with dist mode when transactions is enabled. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 2 months

4
20
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (ISPN-920) TimeoutException: Replication timeout in DIST_ASYNC mode

by Dror Bereznitsky (JIRA)

TimeoutException: Replication timeout in DIST_ASYNC mode -------------------------------------------------------- Key: ISPN-920 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-920 Project: Infinispan Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 4.2.0.Final Reporter: Dror Bereznitsky Assignee: Manik Surtani Attachments: infinispan-test.xml, InfinispanClusterTest.java, jgroups-test.xml, unit-test-1.log, unit-test-2.log I'm running a simple unit test for checking our Infinispan setup. The test involves starting two instances of Infinispan with a single cache in DIST_ASYNC mode. The test creates the cache and start putting new values every X ms. After starting the 2nd or 3rd test instance I'm always getting the following exception: org.infinispan.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Replication timeout for DRORB-LAP-TAN-26976 at org.infinispan.remoting.transport.AbstractTransport.parseResponseAndAddToResponseList(AbstractTransport.java:49) at org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.JGroupsTransport.invokeRemotely(JGroupsTransport.java:414) at org.infinispan.remoting.rpc.RpcManagerImpl.invokeRemotely(RpcManagerImpl.java:101) at org.infinispan.remoting.rpc.RpcManagerImpl.invokeRemotely(RpcManagerImpl.java:125) at org.infinispan.remoting.rpc.RpcManagerImpl.invokeRemotely(RpcManagerImpl.java:230) at org.infinispan.remoting.rpc.RpcManagerImpl.invokeRemotely(RpcManagerImpl.java:217) at org.infinispan.remoting.rpc.RpcManagerImpl.broadcastRpcCommand(RpcManagerImpl.java:200) at org.infinispan.distribution.JoinTask.performRehash(JoinTask.java:132) at org.infinispan.distribution.RehashTask.call(RehashTask.java:53) at org.infinispan.distribution.RehashTask.call(RehashTask.java:33) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:303) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:138) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662) Disabling the L1 cache resolves the problem. Attached are the configuration files, test console output and the test source code. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 2 months

3
7
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

infinispan-issues February 2011