[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-2300) Versioned Transactional Cache issues
by Pedro Ruivo (JIRA)
Pedro Ruivo created ISPN-2300:
---------------------------------
Summary: Versioned Transactional Cache issues
Key: ISPN-2300
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-2300
Project: Infinispan
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Transactions
Affects Versions: 5.2.0.Alpha3
Reporter: Pedro Ruivo
Assignee: Mircea Markus
Description from http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/infinispan-dev/2012-September/011205.html
1) testPutIfAbsent, testRemoveIfPresent, testReplaceWithOldVal (methods
the test cases)
In this tests, it was updating the cache entry with a null version. This
originates later a IllegalStateException when it tries to perform the
write skew check and the version is null.
I have fixed this problem in this way: if the command fails (PutCommand,
RemoveCommand, ReplaceCommand), I unset the flag CHANGED in the
MvccEntry to avoid to update the entry in the DataContainer.
2) testClear in distributed mode
I have no clear idea how to solve this problem but it looks like the
PrepareCommand (with the ClearCommand) is not sent to all the nodes in
the cluster. Then, when I do a get, a remote get is performed and the
key is still there. I think that it is not the desired behavior.
3) testRemoveUnexistingEntry
In this test, it tries to remove a key that does not exists but it does
not success due to a NullPointerException. I have looked deeper and I
check that the transaction's lookup entries map has an entry with [key
=> null] and when it tries to perform the write skew check in that key,
a NullPointerException is thrown in here [2] (line 80, WriteSkewHelper)
[1] https://github.com/pruivo/infinispan/tree/t_replace_fix
[2] https://github.com/pruivo/infinispan/blob/t_replace_fix/core/src/main/jav...
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-2380) OfflineStatusTest.timeBasedTakeOffline failure
by Adrian Nistor (JIRA)
Adrian Nistor created ISPN-2380:
-----------------------------------
Summary: OfflineStatusTest.timeBasedTakeOffline failure
Key: ISPN-2380
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-2380
Project: Infinispan
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Cross-Site Replication
Affects Versions: 5.2.0.Beta1
Reporter: Adrian Nistor
Assignee: Mircea Markus
Fix For: 5.2.0.CR1
This test fails constantly on my machine.
2012-10-11 10:36:35,388 ERROR [org.infinispan.test.fwk.UnitTestTestNGListener] (testng-OfflineStatusTest) Test timeBasedTakeOffline(org.infinispan.xsite.offline.OfflineStatusTest) failed.
java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<true> but was:<false>
at org.testng.Assert.fail(Assert.java:89)
at org.testng.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:480)
at org.testng.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:37)
at org.testng.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:47)
at org.infinispan.test.AbstractInfinispanTest.eventually(AbstractInfinispanTest.java:76)
at org.infinispan.test.AbstractInfinispanTest.eventually(AbstractInfinispanTest.java:59)
at org.infinispan.test.AbstractInfinispanTest.eventually(AbstractInfinispanTest.java:132)
at org.infinispan.xsite.offline.OfflineStatusTest.timeBasedTakeOffline(OfflineStatusTest.java:48)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at org.testng.internal.MethodInvocationHelper.invokeMethod(MethodInvocationHelper.java:74)
at org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeMethod(Invoker.java:673)
at org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeTestMethod(Invoker.java:846)
at org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeTestMethods(Invoker.java:1170)
at org.testng.internal.TestMethodWorker.invokeTestMethods(TestMethodWorker.java:125)
at org.testng.internal.TestMethodWorker.run(TestMethodWorker.java:109)
at org.testng.TestRunner.runWorkers(TestRunner.java:1147)
at org.testng.TestRunner.privateRun(TestRunner.java:749)
at org.testng.TestRunner.run(TestRunner.java:600)
at org.testng.SuiteRunner.runTest(SuiteRunner.java:317)
at org.testng.SuiteRunner.access$000(SuiteRunner.java:34)
at org.testng.SuiteRunner$SuiteWorker.run(SuiteRunner.java:351)
at org.testng.internal.thread.ThreadUtil$CountDownLatchedRunnable.run(ThreadUtil.java:147)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-2318) Reimplement a Topology-Aware Consistent Hash
by Erik Salter (JIRA)
Erik Salter created ISPN-2318:
---------------------------------
Summary: Reimplement a Topology-Aware Consistent Hash
Key: ISPN-2318
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-2318
Project: Infinispan
Issue Type: Task
Components: Core API
Affects Versions: 5.2.0.Alpha3
Reporter: Erik Salter
Assignee: Mircea Markus
Even with the advent of x-site replication, the TACH is useful to stripe key ownership across machines and/or racks for resiliency. This feature should be refactored from the 5.1 impl.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-2025) NPE in Externalizer on shutdown
by Michal Linhard (JIRA)
Michal Linhard created ISPN-2025:
------------------------------------
Summary: NPE in Externalizer on shutdown
Key: ISPN-2025
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-2025
Project: Infinispan
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Marshalling
Affects Versions: 5.1.4.FINAL
Reporter: Michal Linhard
Assignee: Galder Zamarreño
I get this what I get when I'm shutting down one of the clustered nodes (default config standalone-ha.xml) of JDG 6.0.0.ER7
{code}
09:50:25,505 WARN [org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.CommandAwareRpcDispatcher] Problems unmarshalling remote command from byte buffer: java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.infinispan.marshall.jboss.ExternalizerTable.readObject(ExternalizerTable.java:222)
at org.jboss.marshalling.river.RiverUnmarshaller.doReadObject(RiverUnmarshaller.java:351)
at org.jboss.marshalling.river.RiverUnmarshaller.doReadObject(RiverUnmarshaller.java:209)
at org.jboss.marshalling.AbstractObjectInput.readObject(AbstractObjectInput.java:37) [jboss-marshalling-1.3.13.GA-redhat-1.jar:1.3.13.GA-redhat-1]
at org.infinispan.marshall.jboss.AbstractJBossMarshaller.objectFromObjectStream(AbstractJBossMarshaller.java:154)
at org.infinispan.marshall.VersionAwareMarshaller.objectFromByteBuffer(VersionAwareMarshaller.java:114)
at org.infinispan.marshall.AbstractDelegatingMarshaller.objectFromByteBuffer(AbstractDelegatingMarshaller.java:85)
at org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.MarshallerAdapter.objectFromBuffer(MarshallerAdapter.java:50)
at org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.CommandAwareRpcDispatcher.handle(CommandAwareRpcDispatcher.java:200)
at org.jgroups.blocks.RequestCorrelator.handleRequest(RequestCorrelator.java:456) [jgroups-3.0.9.Final-redhat-1.jar:3.0.9.Final-redhat-1]
at org.jgroups.blocks.RequestCorrelator.receiveMessage(RequestCorrelator.java:363) [jgroups-3.0.9.Final-redhat-1.jar:3.0.9.Final-redhat-1]
at org.jgroups.blocks.RequestCorrelator.receive(RequestCorrelator.java:238) [jgroups-3.0.9.Final-redhat-1.jar:3.0.9.Final-redhat-1]
at org.jgroups.blocks.MessageDispatcher$ProtocolAdapter.up(MessageDispatcher.java:543) [jgroups-3.0.9.Final-redhat-1.jar:3.0.9.Final-redhat-1]
at org.jgroups.blocks.mux.MuxUpHandler.up(MuxUpHandler.java:130) [jgroups-3.0.9.Final-redhat-1.jar:3.0.9.Final-redhat-1]
at org.jgroups.JChannel.up(JChannel.java:716) [jgroups-3.0.9.Final-redhat-1.jar:3.0.9.Final-redhat-1]
at org.jgroups.stack.ProtocolStack.up(ProtocolStack.java:1026) [jgroups-3.0.9.Final-redhat-1.jar:3.0.9.Final-redhat-1]
at org.jgroups.protocols.RSVP.up(RSVP.java:179) [jgroups-3.0.9.Final-redhat-1.jar:3.0.9.Final-redhat-1]
at org.jgroups.protocols.FRAG2.up(FRAG2.java:181) [jgroups-3.0.9.Final-redhat-1.jar:3.0.9.Final-redhat-1]
at org.jgroups.protocols.FlowControl.up(FlowControl.java:418) [jgroups-3.0.9.Final-redhat-1.jar:3.0.9.Final-redhat-1]
at org.jgroups.protocols.FlowControl.up(FlowControl.java:400) [jgroups-3.0.9.Final-redhat-1.jar:3.0.9.Final-redhat-1]
at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.GMS.up(GMS.java:889) [jgroups-3.0.9.Final-redhat-1.jar:3.0.9.Final-redhat-1]
at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.STABLE.up(STABLE.java:244) [jgroups-3.0.9.Final-redhat-1.jar:3.0.9.Final-redhat-1]
at org.jgroups.protocols.UNICAST2.handleDataReceived(UNICAST2.java:793) [jgroups-3.0.9.Final-redhat-1.jar:3.0.9.Final-redhat-1]
at org.jgroups.protocols.UNICAST2.up(UNICAST2.java:365) [jgroups-3.0.9.Final-redhat-1.jar:3.0.9.Final-redhat-1]
at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.NAKACK.up(NAKACK.java:602) [jgroups-3.0.9.Final-redhat-1.jar:3.0.9.Final-redhat-1]
at org.jgroups.protocols.FD_ALL.up(FD_ALL.java:177) [jgroups-3.0.9.Final-redhat-1.jar:3.0.9.Final-redhat-1]
at org.jgroups.protocols.FD_SOCK.up(FD_SOCK.java:288) [jgroups-3.0.9.Final-redhat-1.jar:3.0.9.Final-redhat-1]
at org.jgroups.protocols.MERGE2.up(MERGE2.java:205) [jgroups-3.0.9.Final-redhat-1.jar:3.0.9.Final-redhat-1]
at org.jgroups.protocols.Discovery.up(Discovery.java:359) [jgroups-3.0.9.Final-redhat-1.jar:3.0.9.Final-redhat-1]
at org.jgroups.stack.Protocol.up(Protocol.java:363) [jgroups-3.0.9.Final-redhat-1.jar:3.0.9.Final-redhat-1]
at org.jgroups.protocols.TP.passMessageUp(TP.java:1180) [jgroups-3.0.9.Final-redhat-1.jar:3.0.9.Final-redhat-1]
at org.jgroups.protocols.TP$IncomingPacket.handleMyMessage(TP.java:1728) [jgroups-3.0.9.Final-redhat-1.jar:3.0.9.Final-redhat-1]
at org.jgroups.protocols.TP$IncomingPacket.run(TP.java:1710) [jgroups-3.0.9.Final-redhat-1.jar:3.0.9.Final-redhat-1]
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886) [rt.jar:1.6.0_30]
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908) [rt.jar:1.6.0_30]
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662) [rt.jar:1.6.0_30]
at org.jboss.threads.JBossThread.run(JBossThread.java:122) [jboss-threads-2.0.0.GA-redhat-1.jar:2.0.0.GA-redhat-1]
{code}
I've ran the instances out of the box by this commands, binding them to virtual ips on my laptop:
{code}
server1/bin/standalone.sh -b 192.168.11.101 -c standalone-ha.xml -Djboss.bind.address.management=192.168.11.101 -Djboss.node.name=node1
server2/bin/standalone.sh -b 192.168.11.102 -c standalone-ha.xml -Djboss.bind.address.management=192.168.11.102 -Djboss.node.name=node2
{code}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-2368) Two rebalances in parallel
by Radim Vansa (JIRA)
Radim Vansa created ISPN-2368:
---------------------------------
Summary: Two rebalances in parallel
Key: ISPN-2368
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-2368
Project: Infinispan
Issue Type: Bug
Components: State transfer
Affects Versions: 5.2.0.Beta1
Reporter: Radim Vansa
Assignee: Mircea Markus
There is a bug in ClusterTopologyManagerImpl on line 353: the reference to cache topology is obtained prior to entering to the synchronized block, causing that two rebalances can start in parallel, effectively broking the state transfer.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-1855) Accessing a non-distributed cache from a RemoteCacheManager can break topology updates
by Dan Berindei (JIRA)
Dan Berindei created ISPN-1855:
----------------------------------
Summary: Accessing a non-distributed cache from a RemoteCacheManager can break topology updates
Key: ISPN-1855
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1855
Project: Infinispan
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 5.1.1.FINAL
Reporter: Dan Berindei
Assignee: Manik Surtani
Fix For: 5.2.0.FINAL
RemoteCacheManager uses a single consistent hash to map requests to different servers, but caches on the server may have different CHs (or even no CH if the cache is not in distributed mode).
If the first request goes to a on-distributed cache, the client will never request an updated CH and so it will use a round robin strategy for routing request to all the caches. Obviously this is not optimal for distributed caches.
Each distributed cache can also have different members since 5.1, so it would be best if we kept a separate CH per cache on the client.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years