[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-4677) Map/Reduce job fails with the wrong explanation on underlying TimeoutException
by Adrian Nistor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Adrian Nistor updated ISPN-4677:
--------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 7.0.0.CR1
(was: 7.0.0.Beta2)
> Map/Reduce job fails with the wrong explanation on underlying TimeoutException
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-4677
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4677
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Distributed Execution and Map/Reduce
> Affects Versions: 7.0.0.Beta1
> Reporter: Sanne Grinovero
> Assignee: Vladimir Blagojevic
> Fix For: 7.0.0.CR1
>
>
> I'm running a task which is throwing the following exception during the Map phase:
> {noformat}
> org.infinispan.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Node main-NodeC-22183 timed out{noformat}
> The user facing error however is this very confusing message:
> {noformat}org.infinispan.commons.CacheException: java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException: Map phase executing at main-NodeA-39904 did not complete within 0 sec timeout{noformat}
> I have no timeout enabled.
> The problem is the instanceof operation on the cause of the error in org.infinispan.distexec.mapreduce.MapReduceTask.executeMapPhaseWithLocalReduction(Map<KOut, VOut>): the check on the type only is not good enough.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.1#6329)
11 years, 6 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-4664) Consider passing command retries flag to remote events
by Adrian Nistor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Adrian Nistor updated ISPN-4664:
--------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 7.0.0.CR1
(was: 7.0.0.Beta2)
> Consider passing command retries flag to remote events
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-4664
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4664
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: Remote Protocols
> Reporter: Galder Zamarreño
> Assignee: Galder Zamarreño
> Fix For: 7.0.0.CR1
>
>
> Cluster listeners have the ability to check whether an event is the result of a retried command. Even though HR clients are notified of failovers via the @ClientCacheFailover annotation, passing on this information could signal that an event is a duplicate or that another event was dropped and replaced (e.g. modified event replaced a created one).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.1#6329)
11 years, 6 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-4682) Improve SyncConsistentHashFactory key distribution
by Adrian Nistor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Adrian Nistor updated ISPN-4682:
--------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 7.0.0.CR1
(was: 7.0.0.Beta2)
> Improve SyncConsistentHashFactory key distribution
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-4682
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4682
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: Core
> Affects Versions: 6.0.2.Final, 7.0.0.Beta1
> Reporter: Dan Berindei
> Assignee: Dan Berindei
> Labels: performance
> Fix For: 7.0.0.CR1, 7.0.0.Final
>
>
> {{SyncConsistentHashFactory}} and {{TopologyAwareSyncConsistentHashFactory}} distribute the segments between nodes randomly, and the number of segments distributed to different nodes is not very even.
> They should have a fail-safe mechanism to limit the variation in segment number between nodes.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.1#6329)
11 years, 6 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-4681) Preloading from shared cachestore on a new node with non-shared index is skipping indexing
by Adrian Nistor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Adrian Nistor updated ISPN-4681:
--------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 7.0.0.CR1
(was: 7.0.0.Beta2)
> Preloading from shared cachestore on a new node with non-shared index is skipping indexing
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-4681
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4681
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Embedded Querying
> Reporter: Sanne Grinovero
> Assignee: Gustavo Fernandes
> Fix For: 7.0.0.CR1, 7.0.0.Final
>
>
> We have a test already: {{org.infinispan.query.persistence.SharedCacheLoaderQueryIndexTest}}
> It was disabled for other reasons, mistakenly identified as a testsuite error.
> The case is simple: the test is configured in such a way to trigger a newly joining node using an in-memory dummy CacheStore which is shared by both nodes, with preloading enabled.
> Index storage is not shared though: uses {{ram}}.
> During the preload phase of the new node, the preload code issues the {{SKIP_INDEXING}} flag.. which in this case it should not.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.1#6329)
11 years, 6 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-4686) Make Infinispan 7.0 binary compatible with 6.x
by Adrian Nistor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Adrian Nistor updated ISPN-4686:
--------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 7.0.0.CR1
(was: 7.0.0.Beta2)
> Make Infinispan 7.0 binary compatible with 6.x
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-4686
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4686
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 7.0.0.Beta1
> Reporter: Galder Zamarreño
> Assignee: Galder Zamarreño
> Fix For: 7.0.0.CR1
>
>
> The idea here is to try to produce a Infinispan 7.0 jar that's binary compatible with 6.0 in order to ease upgrading. So far, the following elements have been found to be problematic:
> * FileLookupFactory -> FileLookup changes - ISPN-3850
> * JBossStandaloneJTAManagerLookup.init changes - ISPN-3850
> * org.infinispan.AbstractDelegatingAdvancedCache refactoring to org.infinispan.cache.impl.AbstractDelegatingAdvancedCache - ISPN-4074
> XML configuration stays apart since one of the key aspects of 7.0 is to produce WF-like configuration that's as close as possible, to improve usability between library and server mode.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.1#6329)
11 years, 6 months