[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-5247) RESTAsyncIT.testPutOperation fails randomly
by Roman Macor (JIRA)
Roman Macor created ISPN-5247:
---------------------------------
Summary: RESTAsyncIT.testPutOperation fails randomly
Key: ISPN-5247
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-5247
Project: Infinispan
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Test Suite - Server
Affects Versions: 7.2.0.Alpha1
Reporter: Roman Macor
RESTAsyncIT.testPutOperation fails randomly with
Error Message
PUT : async- 12881, sync- 9373
Stacktrace
java.lang.AssertionError: PUT : async- 12881, sync- 9373
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:41)
at org.infinispan.server.test.client.rest.RESTAsyncIT.testPutOperation(RESTAsyncIT.java:85)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.11#6341)
11 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-5180) Hot Rod type converter in Compatibility should not marshall a byte[] again
by RH Bugzilla Integration (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-5180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
RH Bugzilla Integration updated ISPN-5180:
------------------------------------------
Bugzilla Update: Perform
Bugzilla References: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196277
> Hot Rod type converter in Compatibility should not marshall a byte[] again
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-5180
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-5180
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Remote Protocols
> Affects Versions: 7.0.3.Final, 7.1.0.CR2
> Reporter: Galder Zamarreño
> Assignee: Galder Zamarreño
> Priority: Critical
> Labels: compatibility
> Fix For: 7.1.0.Final
>
>
> When compatibility is enabled, storing a java serialized object with REST, and then retrieving it with Hot Rod results in byte[] being returned instead of the deserilialized object:
> {code}java.lang.AssertionError:
> Expected :org.infinispan.it.compatibility.EmbeddedRestHotRodTest$Person@22cd6f
> Actual :[B@2ff9eb2a
> at org.testng.AssertJUnit.fail(AssertJUnit.java:59)
> at org.testng.AssertJUnit.failNotEquals(AssertJUnit.java:364)
> at org.testng.AssertJUnit.assertEquals(AssertJUnit.java:80)
> at org.testng.AssertJUnit.assertEquals(AssertJUnit.java:88)
> at org.infinispan.it.compatibility.EmbeddedRestHotRodTest.testCustomObjectRestPutHotRodEmbeddedGet(EmbeddedRestHotRodTest.java:217)
> {code}
> This is because when the entry is retrieved by Hot Rod and it's going to marshall it for sending it back to the client, it should check if the entry is already a byte[], in which case it should not touch it.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.11#6341)
11 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-5221) Java Hotrod client, nearcache broken after a org.infinispan.client.hotrod.exceptions.TransportException:: java.net.SocketTimeoutException
by Galder Zamarreño (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-5221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Galder Zamarreño commented on ISPN-5221:
----------------------------------------
Yes, apart from the server side logs, the client configuration might be important here. In particular, the options passed in to the RemoteCacheManager in construction.
Also, if you happen to have the GC logs from the server, that'd be great to see what kind of pauses does the server suffer.
Finally, I think we can still improve the code in the event listener to better handle `java.net.SocketTimeoutException` instances when trying to read an event. At the moment, it seems like that after such exception the event listener thread stops its work. I think we can do better than that.
However, I'd still would like to see the logs, GC logs (if available) and client configuration to see if there's something else.
> Java Hotrod client, nearcache broken after a org.infinispan.client.hotrod.exceptions.TransportException:: java.net.SocketTimeoutException
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-5221
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-5221
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 7.1.0.Final
> Environment: Infinispan 7.1.0Final
> Reporter: Enrico Olivelli
> Assignee: Galder Zamarreño
> Fix For: 7.2.0.Final
>
>
> Using the LAZY nearcache (new in 7.1.0Final) when a java.net.SocketTimeoutException occurs against one of the given HotRod server the RemoteCache becames not usable any more
> This happens very frequently in our DEV environment, but I cannot reproduce it inside a test case
> This is the stacktrace
> {code}
> 15/02/13 14:51:39 ERROR event.ClientListenerNotifier: ISPN004043: Unrecoverable error reading event from server xxx.xxx.xxx/10.168.10.117:11222, exiting event reader thread
> org.infinispan.client.hotrod.exceptions.TransportException:: java.net.SocketTimeoutException
> at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.impl.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.readByte(TcpTransport.java:184)
> at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.impl.protocol.Codec20.readMagic(Codec20.java:282)
> at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.impl.protocol.Codec20.readEvent(Codec20.java:126)
> at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.event.ClientListenerNotifier$EventDispatcher.run(ClientListenerNotifier.java:236)
> at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> Caused by: java.net.SocketTimeoutException
> at sun.nio.ch.SocketAdaptor$SocketInputStream.read(SocketAdaptor.java:211)
> at sun.nio.ch.ChannelInputStream.read(ChannelInputStream.java:103)
> at java.io.BufferedInputStream.fill(BufferedInputStream.java:246)
> at java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:265)
> at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.impl.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.readByte(TcpTransport.java:179)
> ... 8 more
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.11#6341)
11 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-4810) Local Transactional Cache loses data when eviction is enabled and there are multiple readers and one writer
by RH Bugzilla Integration (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
RH Bugzilla Integration commented on ISPN-4810:
-----------------------------------------------
Tristan Tarrant <ttarrant(a)redhat.com> changed the Status of [bug 1196258|https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196258] from NEW to ASSIGNED
> Local Transactional Cache loses data when eviction is enabled and there are multiple readers and one writer
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-4810
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4810
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 6.0.2.Final
> Environment: Windows 7 x64 (NTFS)
> Oracle JDK1.7.0_40
> Apache Maven 3.0.5
> Reporter: Horia Chiorean
> Assignee: William Burns
> Labels: modeshape
> Attachments: ispn_concurrent.zip
>
>
> Using Infinispan 6.0.2 and a local, transactional cache backed by a <singleFile> store, with eviction enabled and a small {{max-entries}} setting, we have the following scenario:
> * the main thread (i.e. the "writer") starts a transaction, adds a batch of strings into the cache and also appends the same strings into a List cache entry and then commits the transaction
> * after the above has finished (i.e. after tx.commit) it fires a number of reader threads where each reader thread
> ** checks that the string entries were added into the cache and
> ** checks that the entries were correctly appended to the List entry
> * the above steps are repeated a number of times
> On any given run, based on timing, we're seeing that at some point (after some time) some of the reader threads will not see the latest version of the List entry (i.e. will not see the latest elements that were added into the list) but rather an old, stale List (sort of a "lost update" scenario).
> If we either:
> * disable eviction or
> * set the {{max-entries}} to a large enough value (which I suspect has the same effect - not evicting anything) the problem doesn't show up.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.11#6341)
11 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-4810) Local Transactional Cache loses data when eviction is enabled and there are multiple readers and one writer
by RH Bugzilla Integration (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
RH Bugzilla Integration updated ISPN-4810:
------------------------------------------
Bugzilla Update: Perform
Bugzilla References: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196258
> Local Transactional Cache loses data when eviction is enabled and there are multiple readers and one writer
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-4810
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4810
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 6.0.2.Final
> Environment: Windows 7 x64 (NTFS)
> Oracle JDK1.7.0_40
> Apache Maven 3.0.5
> Reporter: Horia Chiorean
> Assignee: William Burns
> Labels: modeshape
> Attachments: ispn_concurrent.zip
>
>
> Using Infinispan 6.0.2 and a local, transactional cache backed by a <singleFile> store, with eviction enabled and a small {{max-entries}} setting, we have the following scenario:
> * the main thread (i.e. the "writer") starts a transaction, adds a batch of strings into the cache and also appends the same strings into a List cache entry and then commits the transaction
> * after the above has finished (i.e. after tx.commit) it fires a number of reader threads where each reader thread
> ** checks that the string entries were added into the cache and
> ** checks that the entries were correctly appended to the List entry
> * the above steps are repeated a number of times
> On any given run, based on timing, we're seeing that at some point (after some time) some of the reader threads will not see the latest version of the List entry (i.e. will not see the latest elements that were added into the list) but rather an old, stale List (sort of a "lost update" scenario).
> If we either:
> * disable eviction or
> * set the {{max-entries}} to a large enough value (which I suspect has the same effect - not evicting anything) the problem doesn't show up.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.11#6341)
11 years, 1 month