October 2018 - infinispan-issues - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-6367) HotRod client unmarshalling ignores configured classloader

by Tristan Tarrant (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Tristan Tarrant updated ISPN-6367: ---------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 9.4.2.Final (was: 9.4.1.Final) > HotRod client unmarshalling ignores configured classloader > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-6367 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6367 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Remote Protocols, Server > Affects Versions: 8.2.0.Final > Reporter: Dan Berindei > Priority: Major > Fix For: 9.4.2.Final > > > The {{RemoteCacheManager}}'s {{ConfigurationBuilder}} allows you to set a classloader, but the client ignores that classloader when unmarshalling values received from the server. > This leads to problems when the client doesn't have a flat classpath (e.g. in an OSGi or JBoss Modules-based container). -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

5 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-6336) NonIndexedClusteredDummyInMemoryStoreQueryDslConditionsTest random failures

by Tristan Tarrant (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Tristan Tarrant updated ISPN-6336: ---------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 9.4.2.Final (was: 9.4.1.Final) > NonIndexedClusteredDummyInMemoryStoreQueryDslConditionsTest random failures > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-6336 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6336 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Gustavo Fernandes > Assignee: Adrian Nistor > Priority: Major > Labels: testsuite_stability > Fix For: 9.4.2.Final > > > Picked this failure when running the query testsuite in loop. It's somehow hard to reproduce. > The presence of the Byteman test runner in the stacktrace looks suspicious, since it is not supposed to run this test. > {code} > Tests run: 2907, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 51.21 sec <<< FAILURE! - in TestSuite > testSampleDomainQuery16(org.infinispan.query.dsl.embedded.NonIndexedClusteredDummyInMemoryStoreQueryDslConditionsTest) Time elapsed: 0.01 sec <<< FAILURE! > java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<50> but was:<0> > at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88) > at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:743) > at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:118) > at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:555) > at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:542) > at org.infinispan.query.dsl.embedded.QueryDslConditionsTest.testSampleDomainQuery16(QueryDslConditionsTest.java:1366) > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) > at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:497) > at org.testng.internal.MethodInvocationHelper.invokeMethod(MethodInvocationHelper.java:84) > at org.testng.internal.MethodInvocationHelper$1.runTestMethod(MethodInvocationHelper.java:200) > at org.jboss.byteman.contrib.bmunit.BMNGAbstractRunner.run(BMNGAbstractRunner.java:58) > at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor72.invoke(Unknown Source) > at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:497) > at org.testng.internal.MethodInvocationHelper.invokeHookable(MethodInvocationHelper.java:212) > at org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeMethod(Invoker.java:707) > at org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeTestMethod(Invoker.java:901) > at org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeTestMethods(Invoker.java:1231) > at org.testng.internal.TestMethodWorker.invokeTestMethods(TestMethodWorker.java:127) > at org.testng.internal.TestMethodWorker.run(TestMethodWorker.java:111) > at org.testng.TestRunner.privateRun(TestRunner.java:767) > at org.testng.TestRunner.run(TestRunner.java:617) > at org.testng.SuiteRunner.runTest(SuiteRunner.java:348) > at org.testng.SuiteRunner.access$000(SuiteRunner.java:38) > at org.testng.SuiteRunner$SuiteWorker.run(SuiteRunner.java:382) > at org.testng.internal.thread.ThreadUtil$2.call(ThreadUtil.java:64) > at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266) > at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142) > at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) > {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

5 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-6294) Query DSL should allow easy 'continuation' to assist with creating dynamic queries

by Tristan Tarrant (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Tristan Tarrant updated ISPN-6294: ---------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 9.4.2.Final (was: 9.4.1.Final) > Query DSL should allow easy 'continuation' to assist with creating dynamic queries > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-6294 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6294 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: Embedded Querying > Reporter: Adrian Nistor > Priority: Major > Fix For: 9.4.2.Final > > > Conditional chaining of DSL conditions is cumbersome, as shown here: https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/blob/af7f38ba1cf538be6b08d7b895f... -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

5 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-6224) Simplify configuration of Query with Indexing Affinity

by Tristan Tarrant (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Tristan Tarrant updated ISPN-6224: ---------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 9.4.2.Final (was: 9.4.1.Final) > Simplify configuration of Query with Indexing Affinity > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: ISPN-6224 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6224 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: Embedded Querying > Reporter: Sanne Grinovero > Priority: Major > Fix For: 9.4.2.Final > > > We should try to enable the "Index Affinity" capabilities in an easier way from a configuration point of view. > For example I wonder if the capabilities provided by the {{AffinityPartitioner}} could not be enabled by default, for example automatically decorating any user defined {{HashFunctionPartitioner}} so that people can't neither forget to enable it, nor override it. > Second, should it be enabled by default when the cache configuration suggests it, for example in most clustered caches? -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

5 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-6279) Refactor CacheLoader API to make it thread safe

by Tristan Tarrant (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Tristan Tarrant updated ISPN-6279: ---------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 9.4.2.Final (was: 9.4.1.Final) > Refactor CacheLoader API to make it thread safe > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-6279 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6279 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Loaders and Stores > Reporter: Sebastian Łaskawiec > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 9.4.2.Final > > > h3. Introduction > Currently {{CacheLoader}} thread safety can be easily compromised by broken implementations. We should provide a better implementation to make it more convenient and less error prone. > h3. Problem statement > CacheLoader API looks like this: > {code} > public interface AdvancedCacheLoader<K, V> extends CacheLoader<K, V> { > ... > void process(KeyFilter<? super K> filter, CacheLoaderTask<K, V> task, Executor executor, boolean fetchValue, boolean fetchMetadata); > ... > } > {code} > The CacheLoader implementation controls {{CacheLoaderTask}} as well as the number of threads used for processing (specified by {{Executor}}). If one wants to collect all keys (similarly to [AdvancedCacheLoader|https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/blob/master/...]) it is very easy to hit concurrently issues while adding them to the set (See previous JIRAs: ISPN-3938 and ISPN-6276). > h3. Solution > The solution should take away currently control (Executor) and keyset (the simplest idea is to add it to {{CacheLoaderTask}}) from from the implementation. One of the ideas is to create a Lambda expression for pulling records from Cache Store. Note that similar changes will need to be performed to {{CacheWriter}} (to make it similar). -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

5 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-6220) Speedup index rebuilds but using ADD rather than UPDATE statements when safe

by Tristan Tarrant (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Tristan Tarrant updated ISPN-6220: ---------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 9.4.2.Final (was: 9.4.1.Final) > Speedup index rebuilds but using ADD rather than UPDATE statements when safe > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-6220 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6220 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: Embedded Querying > Reporter: Sanne Grinovero > Priority: Major > Fix For: 9.4.2.Final > > > The {{DistributedExecutorMassIndexer}} relies on update commands to index the new entries, but when we just run a full purge of the index it should be safe to use Add commands instead if we know that there aren't concurrent updates. > The lack of concurrent updates might be tricky but I think we can find such a condition when using Affinity as the index is being fully controlled by the current indexing engine, similarly to the checks to see if it's safe to use an NRT workspace. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

5 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-6219) An interruption during a MassIndexer run should exit early

by Tristan Tarrant (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Tristan Tarrant updated ISPN-6219: ---------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 9.4.2.Final (was: 9.4.1.Final) > An interruption during a MassIndexer run should exit early > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-6219 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6219 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Embedded Querying > Reporter: Sanne Grinovero > Priority: Major > Fix For: 9.4.2.Final > > > Methods like {{IndexUpdater.updateIndex()}} correctly check for interruption state to skip some work but they don't trigger an early exit from the indexing loop so we'd still be consuming all of the data stream. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

5 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-6212) InfinispanBackendQueueProcessor is assuming all IndexManager implementations are DirectoryBasedIndexManager

by Tristan Tarrant (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6212?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Tristan Tarrant updated ISPN-6212: ---------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 9.4.2.Final (was: 9.4.1.Final) > InfinispanBackendQueueProcessor is assuming all IndexManager implementations are DirectoryBasedIndexManager > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-6212 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6212 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Task > Components: Embedded Querying > Reporter: Sanne Grinovero > Assignee: Adrian Nistor > Priority: Major > Fix For: 9.4.2.Final > > > See also the FIXME note in {{InfinispanBackendQueueProcessor}}: this needs to be cleaned up. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

5 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-6172) Drop getBulk and getBulkKeys from Hot Rod protocol

by Tristan Tarrant (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Tristan Tarrant updated ISPN-6172: ---------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 9.4.2.Final (was: 9.4.1.Final) > Drop getBulk and getBulkKeys from Hot Rod protocol > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-6172 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6172 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Tristan Tarrant > Assignee: Galder Zamarreño > Priority: Major > Fix For: 9.4.2.Final > > > Drop getBulk and getBulkKeys from Hot Rod protocol. The same could be achieved with the iterator operation, plus values()/entries, not currently implemented by RemoteCache, could be implemented in terms of iterator as well. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

5 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-6170) Remove RequestBalancingStrategy from the HotRod client

by Tristan Tarrant (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Tristan Tarrant updated ISPN-6170: ---------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 9.4.2.Final (was: 9.4.1.Final) > Remove RequestBalancingStrategy from the HotRod client > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: ISPN-6170 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6170 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Task > Components: Remote Protocols > Reporter: Tristan Tarrant > Assignee: Galder Zamarreño > Priority: Major > Fix For: 9.4.2.Final > > > Remove RequestBalancingStrategy, deprecated since 7.0, replaced by FailoverRequestBalancingStrategy -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

5 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

infinispan-issues October 2018