[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-5600) Optimize transactions on multiple caches
by Tristan Tarrant (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-5600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Tristan Tarrant updated ISPN-5600:
----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 9.4.0.Final
(was: 9.4.0.CR3)
> Optimize transactions on multiple caches
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-5600
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-5600
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: Transactions
> Affects Versions: 8.0.0.Alpha2
> Reporter: Radim Vansa
> Fix For: 9.4.0.Final
>
>
> NON_XA transactions that span multiple caches are registered as multiple synchronizations, and these synchronizations are often processed sequentially ^1^; therefore, we send synchronous PrepareCommand for each cache and then CommitCommand for each cache as well, delaying the commit by these round-trips.
> Since the targets for different caches may differ, we still need to send the RPCs separately, but in parallel. Therefore, there should be one uber-synchronization for all caches that use NON_XA mode (and maybe something similar with XA). I believe that using single synchronization could save some allocations, too.
> ^1^ Not sure if full-fledged JTA implementations do that; JTA spec does not say anything about the order of synchronizations and whether these should be processed in parallel.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
7 years, 6 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-6041) Remote Listeners: Client event reader thread reports EOF as error
by Tristan Tarrant (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Tristan Tarrant updated ISPN-6041:
----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 9.4.0.Final
(was: 9.4.0.CR3)
> Remote Listeners: Client event reader thread reports EOF as error
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-6041
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6041
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Remote Protocols
> Affects Versions: 8.1.0.Final
> Reporter: Dan Berindei
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 9.4.0.Final
>
>
> {noformat}
> 14:02:14,904 ERROR (Client-Listener-87aa07aee56d43e1) [ClientListenerNotifier] ISPN004043: Unrecoverable error reading event from server /127.0.0.1:15530, exiting event reader thread
> org.infinispan.client.hotrod.exceptions.TransportException: End of stream reached!
> at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.impl.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.readByte(TcpTransport.java:198)
> at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.impl.protocol.Codec20.readMagic(Codec20.java:305)
> at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.impl.protocol.Codec20.readEvent(Codec20.java:147)
> at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.event.ClientListenerNotifier$EventDispatcher.run(ClientListenerNotifier.java:252)
> at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
7 years, 6 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-6011) ClassCastException in CDI generated keys for JCache
by Tristan Tarrant (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Tristan Tarrant updated ISPN-6011:
----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 9.4.0.Final
(was: 9.4.0.CR3)
> ClassCastException in CDI generated keys for JCache
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-6011
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6011
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 8.1.0.CR1, 8.0.2.Final
> Reporter: Galder Zamarreño
> Assignee: Galder Zamarreño
> Fix For: 9.4.0.Final
>
>
> When using JCache-annotations the DefaultCacheKeyGenerator exclusively looks at parameter values to form the cache key. Therefore it will be very likely that collissions occur (resulting in difficult to find ClassCastExceptions). The provided patch uses the method- and class names as additionally values to make the cache key more unique.
> Might also add that I am aware that by spec this should not be an issue when no cachename is given (as it should generate a cache using the class-name), but when a cache name is given collissions may occur.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
7 years, 6 months