[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-9915) JDBC publish Flowable should explicitly rollback connection
by Tristan Tarrant (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-9915?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Tristan Tarrant updated ISPN-9915:
----------------------------------
Sprint: Sprint 10.0.0.Beta1, JDG Sprint #31 (was: Sprint 10.0.0.Beta1)
> JDBC publish Flowable should explicitly rollback connection
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-9915
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-9915
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Loaders and Stores
> Affects Versions: 10.0.0.Alpha3, 9.4.6.Final
> Reporter: Ryan Emerson
> Assignee: Ryan Emerson
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 9.4.7.Final, 10.0.0.Beta1
>
>
> The Flowable for the JDBC store publisher sets `autoCommit(false)` in order for pagination to work as expected, however we never explicitly call commit or rollback on the connection, therefore the exact behaviour is determined by the underlying connection pool. Instead we should explicitly call rollback() on the connection after the publisher has finished, because the operation is read only.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
6 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-9257) ClustertopologyManagerTest.testAbruptLeaveAfterGetStatus2[SCATTERED_SYNC, tx=false] random failures
by Tristan Tarrant (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-9257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Tristan Tarrant updated ISPN-9257:
----------------------------------
Sprint: Sprint 9.3.0.Final, Sprint 9.4.0.Beta1, Sprint 9.4.0.CR1, Sprint 9.4.0.CR3, Sprint 10.0.0.Alpha1, Sprint 10.0.0.Alpha2, Sprint 9.4.0.Final, Sprint 10.0.0.Alpha0, Sprint 10.0.0.Beta1, JDG Sprint #31 (was: Sprint 9.3.0.Final, Sprint 9.4.0.Beta1, Sprint 9.4.0.CR1, Sprint 9.4.0.CR3, Sprint 10.0.0.Alpha1, Sprint 10.0.0.Alpha2, Sprint 9.4.0.Final, Sprint 10.0.0.Alpha0, Sprint 10.0.0.Beta1)
> ClustertopologyManagerTest.testAbruptLeaveAfterGetStatus2[SCATTERED_SYNC, tx=false] random failures
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-9257
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-9257
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Test Suite - Core
> Affects Versions: 9.3.0.CR1
> Reporter: Dan Berindei
> Assignee: Dan Berindei
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: testsuite_stability
> Fix For: 10.0.0.Final
>
> Attachments: ISPN-8731_wrong_topology_2018-05-18_ClusterTopologyManagerTest-infinispan-core.log.gz
>
>
> The test kills the coordinator NodeA, then while NodeB is trying to recover the caches it also kills NodeC. It expects NodeB to start a rebalance with 2 nodes and discards it, in order to test that it can process the 1-node rebalance first:
> {noformat}
> 00:34:06,582 DEBUG (transport-thread-test-NodeB-p12-t6:[testCache]) [ClusterTopologyManagerTest] Discarding rebalance command CacheTopology{id=8, phase=TRANSITORY, rebalanceId=5, currentCH=ScatteredConsistentHash{ns=256, rebalanced=false, owners = (2)[test-NodeB-49590: 85, test-NodeC-58596: 85]}, pendingCH=ScatteredConsistentHash{ns=256, rebalanced=true, owners = (2)[test-NodeB-49590: 128, test-NodeC-58596: 128]}, unionCH=null, actualMembers=[test-NodeB-49590, test-NodeC-58596], persistentUUIDs=[6b96414e-15d8-4350-aa3c-4fb4fc34e888, d47dc4a9-2a95-4bb1-a83b-bb8a27c9999f]}
> 00:34:06,609 DEBUG (transport-thread-test-NodeB-p12-t2:[Topology-testCache]) [LocalTopologyManagerImpl] Updating local topology for cache testCache: CacheTopology{id=9, phase=TRANSITORY, rebalanceId=5, currentCH=ScatteredConsistentHash{ns=256, rebalanced=false, owners = (1)[test-NodeB-49590: 85]}, pendingCH=ScatteredConsistentHash{ns=256, rebalanced=false, owners = (1)[test-NodeB-49590: 128]}, unionCH=null, actualMembers=[test-NodeB-49590], persistentUUIDs=[6b96414e-15d8-4350-aa3c-4fb4fc34e888]}
> 00:34:06,609 DEBUG (transport-thread-test-NodeB-p12-t2:[Topology-testCache]) [LocalTopologyManagerImpl] Installing fake cache topology CacheTopology{id=8, phase=NO_REBALANCE, rebalanceId=4, currentCH=ScatteredConsistentHash{ns=256, rebalanced=false, owners = (1)[test-NodeB-49590: 85]}, pendingCH=null, unionCH=null, actualMembers=[test-NodeB-49590], persistentUUIDs=[6b96414e-15d8-4350-aa3c-4fb4fc34e888]} for cache testCache
> {noformat}
> Unfortunately {{PreferAvailabilityStrategy}} has changed a bit and the rebalance ids don't always match the expectations of the test, so that the 1-node rebalance is discarded instead:
> {noformat}
> 09:46:10,530 DEBUG (transport-thread-Test-NodeB-p54539-t3:[testCache]) [Test] Discarding rebalance command CacheTopology{id=9, phase=TRANSITORY, rebalanceId=5, currentCH=ScatteredConsistentHash{ns=256, rebalanced=false, owners = (1)[Test-NodeB-62039: 85]}, pendingCH=ScatteredConsistentHash{ns=256, rebalanced=true, owners = (1)[Test-NodeB-62039: 256]}, unionCH=null, actualMembers=[Test-NodeB-62039], persistentUUIDs=[0ed7be74-4485-489b-baee-28c461c9e5de]}
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
6 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-9291) BasePartitionHandlingTest.Partition.installMergeView() doesn't compute the merge digest
by Tristan Tarrant (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-9291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Tristan Tarrant updated ISPN-9291:
----------------------------------
Sprint: Sprint 9.4.0.Beta1, Sprint 9.4.0.CR1, Sprint 9.4.0.CR3, Sprint 10.0.0.Alpha1, Sprint 10.0.0.Alpha2, Sprint 9.4.0.Final, Sprint 10.0.0.Alpha0, Sprint 10.0.0.Beta1, JDG Sprint #31 (was: Sprint 9.4.0.Beta1, Sprint 9.4.0.CR1, Sprint 9.4.0.CR3, Sprint 10.0.0.Alpha1, Sprint 10.0.0.Alpha2, Sprint 9.4.0.Final, Sprint 10.0.0.Alpha0, Sprint 10.0.0.Beta1)
> BasePartitionHandlingTest.Partition.installMergeView() doesn't compute the merge digest
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-9291
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-9291
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Test Suite - Core
> Affects Versions: 9.3.0.CR1
> Reporter: Dan Berindei
> Assignee: Dan Berindei
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: testsuite_stability
> Fix For: 10.0.0.Beta4, 9.4.16.Final
>
>
> The partition handling tests use {{BasePartitionHandlingTest.Partition.installMergeView(view1, view2)}} to install the merge view without waiting for {{MERGE3}} to run, making them much faster. Unfortunately, the implementation is incorrect: {{GMS.installView(view)}} only works for regular views, merge views need to be installed with {{GMS.installView(mergeView, digest)}}.
> The result is that the nodes that got isolated from the coordinator request the retransmission of all the {{NAKACK2}} messages (including view updates) since the cluster first started. The isolated nodes cannot install the merge view until they deliver all the older messages (even without knowing whether they're OOB or not). But if {{STABLE}} ran and cleared a range of messages already, the retransmission request cannot be satisfied, so the view updates will never be delivered.
> This is easily reproducible in {{CrashedNodeDuringConflictResolutionTest}} if we add a delay before updating the topology in {{StateConsumerImpl}}. The test installs the merge view manually, but then kills NodeC and expects the cluster to install the new view automatically. NodeD can't install the new view because it's waiting for earlier messages from NodeA:
> {noformat}
> 18:27:13,054 INFO (testng-test:[]) [TestSuiteProgress] Test starting: org.infinispan.conflict.impl.CrashedNodeDuringConflictResolutionTest.testPartitionMergePolicy[DIST_SYNC]
> 18:27:13,640 DEBUG (testng-test:[]) [GMS] test-NodeA-39513: installing view MergeView::[test-NodeA-39513|10] (4) [test-NodeA-39513, test-NodeB-9439, test-NodeC-43706, test-NodeD-59078], 2 subgroups: [test-NodeA-39513|8] (2) [test-NodeA-39513, test-NodeB-9439], [test-NodeC-43706|9] (2) [test-NodeC-43706, test-NodeD-59078]
> 18:27:13,674 DEBUG (testng-test:[]) [GMS] test-NodeD-59078: installing view MergeView::[test-NodeA-39513|10] (4) [test-NodeA-39513, test-NodeB-9439, test-NodeC-43706, test-NodeD-59078], 2 subgroups: [test-NodeA-39513|8] (2) [test-NodeA-39513, test-NodeB-9439], [test-NodeC-43706|9] (2) [test-NodeC-43706, test-NodeD-59078]
> 18:27:13,828 TRACE (jgroups-7,test-NodeD-59078:[]) [NAKACK2] test-NodeD-59078: sending XMIT_REQ ((1): {50}) to test-NodeA-39513
> 18:27:13,966 TRACE (Timer runner-1,test-NodeD-59078:[]) [NAKACK2] test-NodeD-59078: sending XMIT_REQ ((49): {1-49}) to test-NodeA-39513
> 18:27:14,067 TRACE (Timer runner-1,test-NodeD-59078:[]) [NAKACK2] test-NodeD-59078: sending XMIT_REQ ((45): {1-45}) to test-NodeA-39513
> 18:27:14,504 DEBUG (testng-test:[]) [DefaultCacheManager] Stopping cache manager ISPN on test-NodeC-43706
> 18:27:18,642 TRACE (VERIFY_SUSPECT.TimerThread-89,test-NodeA-39513:[]) [GMS] test-NodeA-39513: joiners=[], suspected=[test-NodeC-43706], leaving=[], new view: [test-NodeA-39513|11] (3) [test-NodeA-39513, test-NodeB-9439, test-NodeD-59078]
> 18:27:18,643 TRACE (VERIFY_SUSPECT.TimerThread-89,test-NodeA-39513:[]) [GMS] test-NodeA-39513: mcasting view [test-NodeA-39513|11] (3) [test-NodeA-39513, test-NodeB-9439, test-NodeD-59078]
> 18:27:18,646 DEBUG (VERIFY_SUSPECT.TimerThread-89,test-NodeA-39513:[]) [GMS] test-NodeA-39513: installing view [test-NodeA-39513|11] (3) [test-NodeA-39513, test-NodeB-9439, test-NodeD-59078]
> 18:27:18,652 TRACE (VERIFY_SUSPECT.TimerThread-89,test-NodeA-39513:[]) [TCP_NIO2] test-NodeA-39513: sending msg to null, src=test-NodeA-39513, headers are GMS: GmsHeader[VIEW], NAKACK2: [MSG, seqno=63], TP: [cluster_name=ISPN]
> 18:27:18,656 TRACE (jgroups-20,test-NodeA-39513:[]) [TCP_NIO2] test-NodeA-39513: received [dst: test-NodeA-39513, src: test-NodeB-9439 (3 headers), size=0 bytes, flags=OOB|INTERNAL], headers are GMS: GmsHeader[VIEW_ACK], UNICAST3: DATA, seqno=100, TP: [cluster_name=ISPN]
> 18:27:20,554 TRACE (Timer runner-1,test-NodeD-59078:[]) [NAKACK2] test-NodeD-59078: sending XMIT_REQ ((45): {1-45}) to test-NodeA-39513
> 18:27:20,653 WARN (VERIFY_SUSPECT.TimerThread-89,test-NodeA-39513:[]) [GMS] test-NodeA-39513: failed to collect all ACKs (expected=2) for view [test-NodeA-39513|11] after 2000ms, missing 1 ACKs from (1) test-NodeD-59078
> 18:27:20,656 TRACE (Timer runner-1,test-NodeD-59078:[]) [NAKACK2] test-NodeD-59078: sending XMIT_REQ ((45): {1-45}) to test-NodeA-39513
> 18:27:20,756 TRACE (Timer runner-1,test-NodeD-59078:[]) [NAKACK2] test-NodeD-59078: sending XMIT_REQ ((45): {1-45}) to test-NodeA-39513
> ...
> 18:28:14,412 TRACE (Timer runner-1,test-NodeD-59078:[]) [NAKACK2] test-NodeD-59078: sending XMIT_REQ ((45): {1-45}) to test-NodeA-39513
> 18:28:14,513 TRACE (Timer runner-1,test-NodeD-59078:[]) [NAKACK2] test-NodeD-59078: sending XMIT_REQ ((45): {1-45}) to test-NodeA-39513
> 18:28:14,589 ERROR (testng-test:[]) [TestSuiteProgress] Test failed: org.infinispan.conflict.impl.CrashedNodeDuringConflictResolutionTest.testPartitionMergePolicy[DIST_SYNC]
> java.lang.RuntimeException: Cache ___defaultcache timed out waiting for rebalancing to complete on node test-NodeA-39513, current topology is CacheTopology{id=21, phase=CONFLICT_RESOLUTION, rebalanceId=7, currentCH=PartitionerConsistentHash:DefaultConsistentHash{ns=256, owners = (3)[test-NodeD-59078: 256+0, test-NodeA-39513: 0+256, test-NodeB-9439: 0+256]}, pendingCH=null, unionCH=null, actualMembers=[test-NodeD-59078, test-NodeA-39513, test-NodeB-9439], persistentUUIDs=[828108c4-4251-49fc-9481-ff6392bea9fb, 1d4b6f07-b71b-41a1-adfb-abbe68944a9f, 3a1ece05-c282-433e-9eb5-7b3e0f1932aa]}. rebalanceInProgress=true, currentChIsBalanced=true
> at org.infinispan.test.TestingUtil.waitForNoRebalance(TestingUtil.java:392) ~[test-classes/:?]
> at org.infinispan.conflict.impl.CrashedNodeDuringConflictResolutionTest.performMerge(CrashedNodeDuringConflictResolutionTest.java:113) ~[test-classes/:?]
> at org.infinispan.conflict.impl.BaseMergePolicyTest.testPartitionMergePolicy(BaseMergePolicyTest.java:137) ~[test-classes/:?]
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
6 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-7624) Change CacheLoaderInterceptor to ignore in memory for certain operations when passivation is not enabled
by Tristan Tarrant (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-7624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Tristan Tarrant updated ISPN-7624:
----------------------------------
Sprint: Sprint 9.4.0.CR1, Sprint 9.4.0.CR3, Sprint 10.0.0.Alpha1, Sprint 10.0.0.Alpha2, Sprint 9.4.0.Final, Sprint 10.0.0.Alpha0, Sprint 10.0.0.Beta1, JDG Sprint #31 (was: Sprint 9.4.0.CR1, Sprint 9.4.0.CR3, Sprint 10.0.0.Alpha1, Sprint 10.0.0.Alpha2, Sprint 9.4.0.Final, Sprint 10.0.0.Alpha0, Sprint 10.0.0.Beta1)
> Change CacheLoaderInterceptor to ignore in memory for certain operations when passivation is not enabled
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-7624
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-7624
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Loaders and Stores
> Reporter: Will Burns
> Assignee: Will Burns
> Priority: Major
>
> CacheLoader currently reads all in memory entries and then the store for bulk operations. This can be changed to only load from the store when passivation is not used as it should contain all entries that aren't in memory.
> The only issue is that if Flag.SKIP_CACHE_STORE was used on a write. In this case we could store a boolean in the interceptor so that if this Flag is ever used we always do both. Very few users use this Flag and it should improve performance a bit and entries should be seen more consistently.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
6 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-9036) Parameterized branding for C++
by Tristan Tarrant (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-9036?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Tristan Tarrant updated ISPN-9036:
----------------------------------
Sprint: Sprint 9.3.0.Alpha1, Sprint 9.3.0.Beta1, Sprint 9.3.0.CR1, Sprint 9.3.0.Final, Sprint 9.4.0.Beta1, Sprint 9.4.0.CR1, Sprint 9.4.0.CR3, Sprint 10.0.0.Alpha1, Sprint 10.0.0.Alpha2, Sprint 9.4.0.Final, Sprint 10.0.0.Alpha0, Sprint 10.0.0.Beta1, JDG Sprint #31 (was: Sprint 9.3.0.Alpha1, Sprint 9.3.0.Beta1, Sprint 9.3.0.CR1, Sprint 9.3.0.Final, Sprint 9.4.0.Beta1, Sprint 9.4.0.CR1, Sprint 9.4.0.CR3, Sprint 10.0.0.Alpha1, Sprint 10.0.0.Alpha2, Sprint 9.4.0.Final, Sprint 10.0.0.Alpha0, Sprint 10.0.0.Beta1)
> Parameterized branding for C++
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-9036
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-9036
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Reporter: Tristan Tarrant
> Assignee: Vittorio Rigamonti
> Priority: Major
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
6 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-8861) DIST Iteration shouldn't go remote when a shared cache store is present
by Tristan Tarrant (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Tristan Tarrant updated ISPN-8861:
----------------------------------
Sprint: Sprint 9.4.0.CR1, Sprint 9.4.0.CR3, Sprint 10.0.0.Alpha1, Sprint 10.0.0.Alpha2, Sprint 9.4.0.Final, Sprint 10.0.0.Alpha0, Sprint 10.0.0.Beta1, JDG Sprint #31 (was: Sprint 9.4.0.CR1, Sprint 9.4.0.CR3, Sprint 10.0.0.Alpha1, Sprint 10.0.0.Alpha2, Sprint 9.4.0.Final, Sprint 10.0.0.Alpha0, Sprint 10.0.0.Beta1)
> DIST Iteration shouldn't go remote when a shared cache store is present
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-8861
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8861
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: Loaders and Stores
> Reporter: Will Burns
> Assignee: Will Burns
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 10.0.0.Final
>
>
> When a user runs a distributed iteration operation with a shared cache store, this shouldn't go remote as the local node would have all the data available to it. This is similar to the optimization when we don't go remote if the current node is an owner for all required segments.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
6 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-9847) Extend configuration to allow inline JGroups configuration and inheritance
by Tristan Tarrant (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-9847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Tristan Tarrant updated ISPN-9847:
----------------------------------
Sprint: Sprint 10.0.0.Beta1, JDG Sprint #31 (was: Sprint 10.0.0.Beta1)
> Extend configuration to allow inline JGroups configuration and inheritance
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-9847
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-9847
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: Configuration, Core
> Affects Versions: 10.0.0.Alpha2
> Reporter: Tristan Tarrant
> Assignee: Tristan Tarrant
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 10.0.0.Beta1, 10.0.0.Final
>
>
> Allowing inline JGroups configurations to increase usability.
> Also support the following extra features:
> * stack inheritance with protocol replacement/override
> * easier xsite configuration
> {code:xml}
> <jgroups transport="org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.JGroupsTransport">
> <!-- Load external JGroups stacks -->
> <stack-file name="udp" path="stacks/udp.xml"/>
> <stack-file name="tcp" path="stacks/tcp.xml"/>
> <!-- Inline definition -->
> <stack name="mping">
> <TCP bind_port="7800" port_range="30" recv_buf_size="20000000" send_buf_size="640000"
> sock_conn_timeout="300" bundler_type="no-bundler"
> thread_pool.min_threads="0" thread_pool.max_threads="25" thread_pool.keep_alive_time="5000"/>
> <MPING bind_addr="127.0.0.1" break_on_coord_rsp="true"
> mcast_addr="${jgroups.mping.mcast_addr:228.2.4.6}"
> mcast_port="${jgroups.mping.mcast_port:43366}"
> ip_ttl="${jgroups.udp.ip_ttl:2}"/>
> <MERGE3/>
> <FD_SOCK/>
> <FD_ALL timeout="3000"
> interval="1000"
> timeout_check_interval="1000"
> />
> <VERIFY_SUSPECT timeout="1000"/>
> <pbcast.NAKACK2
> use_mcast_xmit="false"
> xmit_interval="100"
> xmit_table_num_rows="50"
> xmit_table_msgs_per_row="1024"
> xmit_table_max_compaction_time="30000"/>
> <UNICAST3
> xmit_interval="100"
> xmit_table_num_rows="50"
> xmit_table_msgs_per_row="1024"
> xmit_table_max_compaction_time="30000"
> />
> <RSVP />
> <pbcast.STABLE stability_delay="200"
> desired_avg_gossip="2000"
> max_bytes="1M"
> />
> <pbcast.GMS print_local_addr="false"
> join_timeout="${jgroups.join_timeout:2000}"/>
> <MFC max_credits="2M" min_threshold="0.40"/>
> <FRAG3/>
> </stack>
> <!-- Use the "tcp" stack but override some protocol attributes -->
> <stack name="mytcp" extends="tcp">
> <MERGE3 max_interval="20000"/>
> </stack>
> <!-- Use the "tcp" stack but replace the discovery -->
> <stack name="tcpgossip" extends="tcp">
> <TCPGOSSIP initial_hosts="${jgroups.tunnel.gossip_router_hosts:localhost[12001]}" stack.combine="replace:TCP_NIO2"/>
> </stack>
> <!-- Add a relay configuration using a previously declared stack to talk to the remote site -->
> <stack name="xsite" extends="udp">
> <relay site="LON">
> <remote-site name="NYC" stack="tcpgossip"/>
> </relay>
> </stack>
> </jgroups>
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
6 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-4075) State transfer should preserve the creation timestamp of entries
by Tristan Tarrant (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Tristan Tarrant updated ISPN-4075:
----------------------------------
Sprint: Sprint 10.0.0.Alpha2, Sprint 10.0.0.Beta1, JDG Sprint #31 (was: Sprint 10.0.0.Alpha2, Sprint 10.0.0.Beta1)
> State transfer should preserve the creation timestamp of entries
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-4075
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4075
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: Core
> Affects Versions: 6.0.1.Final
> Reporter: Dan Berindei
> Assignee: Dan Berindei
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 9.4.7.Final, 10.0.0.Beta1, 10.0.0.Final
>
>
> State transfer inserts values with the current time as the creation time. Since the entries store the expected lifespan and not the expected expiration time, entries on the receiving node could expire much later than intended.
> The argument probably doesn't apply to the timestamp of the last usage. Since state transfer process could be interpreted as a reader, it should be fine to extend the update the time of the last usage both on the sending node and on the receiving node.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
6 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-9366) Cache.size optimizations
by Tristan Tarrant (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-9366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Tristan Tarrant updated ISPN-9366:
----------------------------------
Sprint: Sprint 9.4.0.CR1, Sprint 9.4.0.CR3, Sprint 10.0.0.Alpha1, Sprint 10.0.0.Alpha2, Sprint 9.4.0.Final, Sprint 10.0.0.Alpha0, Sprint 10.0.0.Beta1, JDG Sprint #31 (was: Sprint 9.4.0.CR1, Sprint 9.4.0.CR3, Sprint 10.0.0.Alpha1, Sprint 10.0.0.Alpha2, Sprint 9.4.0.Final, Sprint 10.0.0.Alpha0, Sprint 10.0.0.Beta1)
> Cache.size optimizations
> ------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-9366
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-9366
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Reporter: Will Burns
> Assignee: Will Burns
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 10.0.0.Final
>
>
> Now that we have a segmented data container and segmented store we can add optimizations for the Cache.size operation in various configurations.
> If a store is configured, passivation must be disabled for any of these optimizations related to stores to work
> # Shared store can just invoke Store.size
> # No store & no expired entries can invoke DataContainer.sizeIncludingExpired(IntSet)
> # Non shared store can invoke Store.size(IntSet)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
6 years, 9 months