[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-8003) ProtobufMetadataManagerInterceptor fail the InterceptorDefinesAllReadWritesCheck
by Tristan Tarrant (Jira)
[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ISPN-8003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Tristan Tarrant closed ISPN-8003.
---------------------------------
> ProtobufMetadataManagerInterceptor fail the InterceptorDefinesAllReadWritesCheck
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-8003
> URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ISPN-8003
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 8.2.0.Final, 9.0.0.Final
> Reporter: Nistor Adrian
> Assignee: Nistor Adrian
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 10.0.0.Beta4
>
>
> {code}
> ProtobufMetadataManagerInterceptor.java:43, InterceptorDefinesAllReadWritesCheck, Priority: Normal
> Interceptor defines methods [visitPutKeyValueCommand, visitRemoveCommand, visitPutMapCommand, visitReplaceCommand] but does not define [visitReadWriteKeyCommand, visitReadWriteManyCommand, visitReadWriteKeyValueCommand, visitReadWriteManyEntriesCommand] [not required for tests]
> {code}
> {code}
> QueryInterceptor.java:69, InterceptorDefinesAllReadWritesCheck, Priority: Normal
> Interceptor defines methods [visitPutKeyValueCommand, visitRemoveCommand, visitPutMapCommand, visitReplaceCommand] but does not define [visitReadWriteKeyCommand, visitReadWriteManyCommand, visitReadWriteKeyValueCommand, visitReadWriteManyEntriesCommand] [not required for tests]
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
6 years
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-8003) ProtobufMetadataManagerInterceptor fail the InterceptorDefinesAllReadWritesCheck
by Tristan Tarrant (Jira)
[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ISPN-8003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Tristan Tarrant updated ISPN-8003:
----------------------------------
Status: Resolved (was: Pull Request Sent)
Fix Version/s: 10.0.0.Beta4
(was: 10.1.0.Final)
Resolution: Done
> ProtobufMetadataManagerInterceptor fail the InterceptorDefinesAllReadWritesCheck
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-8003
> URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ISPN-8003
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 8.2.0.Final, 9.0.0.Final
> Reporter: Nistor Adrian
> Assignee: Nistor Adrian
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 10.0.0.Beta4
>
>
> {code}
> ProtobufMetadataManagerInterceptor.java:43, InterceptorDefinesAllReadWritesCheck, Priority: Normal
> Interceptor defines methods [visitPutKeyValueCommand, visitRemoveCommand, visitPutMapCommand, visitReplaceCommand] but does not define [visitReadWriteKeyCommand, visitReadWriteManyCommand, visitReadWriteKeyValueCommand, visitReadWriteManyEntriesCommand] [not required for tests]
> {code}
> {code}
> QueryInterceptor.java:69, InterceptorDefinesAllReadWritesCheck, Priority: Normal
> Interceptor defines methods [visitPutKeyValueCommand, visitRemoveCommand, visitPutMapCommand, visitReplaceCommand] but does not define [visitReadWriteKeyCommand, visitReadWriteManyCommand, visitReadWriteKeyValueCommand, visitReadWriteManyEntriesCommand] [not required for tests]
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
6 years
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-10292) It should be possible to add protobuf files directly to the server installation
by Tristan Tarrant (Jira)
[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ISPN-10292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Tristan Tarrant updated ISPN-10292:
-----------------------------------
Status: Open (was: Pull Request Sent)
> It should be possible to add protobuf files directly to the server installation
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-10292
> URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ISPN-10292
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: Server
> Reporter: Wolf-Dieter Fink
> Priority: Major
> Labels: protobuf, query
>
> Definition files (protobuf) for queries and indexing need to be added with client requests during runtime.
> It will be stored in an internal cache and there is a persistence with a filestore to ensure it will survive restarts.
> But this is not always ensured as there might be catastropic failures or unclean shutdown which can cause inconsistence or complete loss.
> The behaviour in such cases is not deterministic and heavy to track or solve.
> For this reason it should be possible to add the protobuf definitions directly to the server installation which is picked up during startup.
> It might be a local cache as the expectation is that all nodes will have the same, but a repl cache might be possible as well.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
6 years
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-10818) ProtoStream 9.4.x client backwards compatibility
by Tristan Tarrant (Jira)
[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ISPN-10818?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Tristan Tarrant updated ISPN-10818:
-----------------------------------
Status: Open (was: Pull Request Sent)
> ProtoStream 9.4.x client backwards compatibility
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-10818
> URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ISPN-10818
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Remote Querying
> Affects Versions: 10.0.0.CR3
> Reporter: Ryan Emerson
> Assignee: Nistor Adrian
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 10.1.0.Final
>
>
> For performance reasons, ProtoStream changed the TypeId of WrappedMessage to 0, which means that pre 10.x clients using RemoteQuery are no longer compatible. Furthermore, ISPN-10663 updated the TypeId of the remote query messages to conform to the Infinispan TypeId ranges defined in ProtoStreamTypeIds.
> Therefore, for pre 10.x clients, it is neccessary for all remote query requests to have the legacy TypeId mapped to the new TypeId values. https://issues.jboss.org/browse/IPROTO-119 introduced a mechanism for this mapping, however more work is required, as the mapping must occur on a per request/response basis (only if communication is with a legacy client).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
6 years