Dan Berindei created ISPN-2407: ---------------------------------- Summary: StateProviderImpl.getTransactionsForSegments can fail with an IllegalStateException Key: ISPN-2407 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-2407 Project: Infinispan Issue Type: Bug Components: State transfer Affects Versions: 5.2.0.Beta2 Reporter: Dan Berindei Assignee: Dan Berindei Priority: Critical Fix For: 5.2.0.CR1 I have seen this in NoRpcOnReadonlyTransactionsTest: {noformat} 18:07:58,765 TRACE (OOB-2,ISPN,NodeE-8639:a) [StateProviderImpl] Transactions were requested by node NodeF-33213 with topology 3, greater than the local topology (1). Waiting for topology 3 to be installed locally. 18:07:58,765 TRACE (OOB-2,ISPN,NodeE-8639:) [InboundInvocationHandlerImpl] Exception executing command java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Node NodeE-8639 is not a member at org.infinispan.distribution.ch.DefaultConsistentHash.getSegmentsForOwner(DefaultConsistentHash.java:97) at org.infinispan.statetransfer.StateProviderImpl.getTransactionsForSegments(StateProviderImpl.java:203) at org.infinispan.statetransfer.StateRequestCommand.perform(StateRequestCommand.java:88) {noformat} The problem is that {{StateProviderImpl.getSegmentsForOwner}} uses an older consistent hash "cached" in StateProviderImpl, but the topology id in StateTransferLockImpl has been already updated by {{StateConsumerImpl.onTopologyUpdate}}, so calling {{StateTransferLockImpl.waitForTopology}} doesn't do anything. The simplest solution would be to call {{StateProviderImpl.onTopologyUpdate}} before {{StateConsumerImpl.onTopologyUpdate}}, and it doesn't look like it would cause any problems. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira