[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin....
]
Dan Berindei commented on ISPN-4229:
------------------------------------
{quote}
So even if the user does have access to a table in another schema, it can't use it
implicitly?
I'm not sure I understand this part, could you reformulate please
{quote}
I was thinking of when the user _does_ want multiple users to store their tables in the
same schema. Especially in the context of ISPN-3006, I wasn't sure if Thomas' fix
and your fix are equivalent, but it looks like they are - at least for Oracle.
The JDBC Cache store should not require the schema name
configuration
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: ISPN-4229
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4229
Project: Infinispan
Issue Type: Feature Request
Reporter: Mircea Markus
Assignee: Mircea Markus
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira