+1 Makes sense to me! M On Oct 9, 2015 4:15 PM, "Paul Gier" <pgier(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I realized the ".0" is probably redundant in "javaee-7.0", since there > will never be a "javaee-7.1". And the "7.0" sort of makes it seem like > we are referring to the EAP version in some of the BOM artifactIds such > as "jboss-javaee-7.0-eap". I propose we change these artifactIds to use > "7" instead of "7.0". So, for example: > > jboss-javaee-7.0-eap -> jboss-javaee-7-eap > > We haven't released eap 7.0 Alpha yet, so I think these current > artifactIds have not spread too far into the wild yet to cause much of a > problem. > > The trickier case would be the javaee specs BOM > (org.jboss.spec:jboss-javaee-7.0) since this does already have some > official community releases in Nexus. So we should probably just leave > this one as-is. > > Thanks in advance for any feedback! > _______________________________________________ > jbossdeveloper mailing list > jbossdeveloper(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossdeveloper > _______________________________________________ jbossdeveloper mailing list jbossdeveloper(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossdeveloper