So does that mean we can/should put the repository definitions back into the quickstart
poms?
----- Original Message -----
We’re switching back :-/
> On 31 Oct 2014, at 15:48, Keith Babo < kbabo(a)redhat.com >
wrote:
> Hey - this caught me a bit by surprise. I thought that the JDF
approach was
> to externalize repository definitions from the pom.xml and reference them
> via an external settings.xml. I ask because we have traditionally included
> repo definitions in SY quickstarts.
> thanks,
> keith
> On Oct 31, 2014, at 9:56 AM, Rafael Benevides <
benevides(a)redhat.com >
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
>
> > I was thinking about the implementation of the repository
definition in
> > pom.xml and I want to share my thoughts:
>
> > - Create a QSTools CHECKER to mark the lack of
<repository /> as a
> > guideline
> > violation if MavenCentralChecker is disabled.
>
> > - The violation message will instruct to use the new QSTools GOAL that
> > will
> > be created
>
> > - Create another QSTools GOAL to setup the repositories.
>
> > - There will be a list of approved repositories and its IDs (redhat
> > techpreview, earlyacess, jboss developer temporary, etc)
>
> > - QSTools will remove all previous repositories from pom.xml and prompt
> > which
> > repositories should be added.
>
> > - This will help Quickstarts and demos to be easily buildable from
> > development and production branches and will also allow this list to be
> > bulk
> > updated to remove any previous development repository definition.
>
> > Please,
>
> > If you have any feedback on this, feel free to reply.
>
> > --
>
> > Rafael Benevides | Senior Software Engineer
>
> > JBoss Developer
>
> > M: +55-61-9269-6576
>
> >
<{a8aabf3a-4467-4e37-9bc5-48b1d7b494a2}_LATAM_RedHat.jpg>
>
> > Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community
collaboration.
>
> > See how it works at
www.redhat.com
>
> > <linkedin.png> <youtube.png>
>