Max/Fred
Can you please review
https://mojo.redhat.com/docs/DOC-997344 and
confirm if those ids are ok. If not, do you mind to place the right
information at the document?
Pete/Max,
Do you know if Fuse maven repository still valid ?
Thanks
On 10/31/14 11:56, Rafael Benevides wrote:
Hi all,
I was thinking about the implementation of the repository definition
in pom.xml and I want to share my thoughts:
- Create a QSTools CHECKER to mark the lack of <repository /> as a
guideline violation if MavenCentralChecker is disabled.
- The violation message will instruct to use the new QSTools GOAL
that will be created
- Create another QSTools GOAL to setup the repositories.
- There will be a list of approved repositories and its IDs (redhat
techpreview, earlyacess, jboss developer temporary, etc)
- QSTools will remove all previous repositories from pom.xml and
prompt which repositories should be added.
- This will help Quickstarts and demos to be easily buildable from
development and production branches and will also allow this list to
be bulk updated to remove any previous development repository definition.
Please,
If you have any feedback on this, feel free to reply.
--
*Rafael Benevides | Senior Software Engineer*
JBoss Developer
M: +55-61-9269-6576
Red Hat
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at
www.redhat.com <
http://www.redhat.com/>
LinkedIn <
http://www.linkedin.com/company/3258288> Youtube
<
https://www.youtube.com/redhatlatam>
_______________________________________________
jbossdeveloper mailing list
jbossdeveloper(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossdeveloper