With kind regards,
Geoffrey De Smet
OptaPlanner lead
On 25-08-14 15:07, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
On 25 Aug 2014, at 14:50, Rafael Benevides wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On a look for a continuous improvement on developer user experience
> and also because we have been constantly asked to support issues
> related to the setup of
https://access.redhat.com/maven-repository to
> make the quickstarts work, we want to include the <repository />
> definition on quickstarts pom.xml
>
> Actually the Archetypes already have the <repository /> on the
> pom.xml file of the generated project.
>
> The idea here is to have the <repository /> with the
>
https://maven.repository.redhat.com/techpreview/all/ defined on every
> quickstarts's pom.xml file with a comment on top of it saying that
> this approach is not recommended but we included it so users can test
> the quickstarts without further setup and that it's recommended to
> use settings.xml.
>
> It will bring the following advantages:
> - It will make ease to contributors and users
> - Simplify the build.
> - Simplify the Archetype synch process / No need to inject the repo
> since it will come from the Quickstarts
> - We can add a pre-defined comment above the pom.xml repository
> definition to explain that we don't recommend that.
> - We can also add this "comment" to QSTools to check/fix it.
>
> As a roadmap for it:
> - We need to document that at the
>
https://github.com/jboss-developer/jboss-developer-shared-resources
> - We need to update the contributing guides
> - We need to update QSTools to do this update on all quickstarts for us.
>
> Max, Is there any restrictions on JBDS side ?
No, as long as we keep that comment about its bad practice and don't
start moving it into shared parent pom's we should be fine :)
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen