We also need to check that with JBDS, because it's odd that stacks only
uses "redhat-techpreview-all-repository" as additional repository.
Max/Fred,
Is there any issues having
as declared inside
quickstarts pom.xml ?
Em 9/9/14, 9:27, Pete Muir escreveu:
On 9 Sep 2014, at 13:06, Marek Novotny <mnovotny(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> On 9.9.2014 13:56, Pete Muir wrote:
>> On 9 Sep 2014, at 12:54, Marek Novotny <mnovotny(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 9.9.2014 13:00, Pete Muir wrote:
>>>> On 9 Sep 2014, at 11:35, Marek Novotny <mnovotny(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 8.9.2014 18:48, Pete Muir wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> QSTools ticket:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JDF-762
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> But after placing
http://maven.repository.redhat.com/techpreview/all/ at the Quickstarts, I realized that we
won't solve the user experience issues without adding -
https://maven.repository.redhat.com// and
>>>>>>>>>>>> -
http://jboss-developer.github.io/temp-maven-repo/ also
>>>>>>>>>>>> for the -develop branch.
>>>>>>>>>> I’m not sure we need to worry about people using
the -develop branch. This is for contributors only, and they can read the instructions
normally.
>>>>>>>> So I assume that we need to inject
http://maven.repository.redhat.com/techpreview/all/ in pom.xml and make them to add the
others in settings.xml
>>>>>> Well, we may want to add earlyaccess too. WDYT?
>>>>>>
>>>>> Why we should have it there for end users? earlyaccess repository is
>>>>> just exceptional resource for public Betas, isn't it? Isn't
that
>>>>> confusing to have it there even for traditional GA releases?
>>>> OTOH this is not really the way Maven works. In Maven you tend to mix up
all releases, and use version numbers to control what gets pulled in.
>>> Even I agree with your statement, do we have a clean description there
>>> what could end users understand why we have a bunch or repositories
>>> there instead of one? We declared today that you can use our product
>>> maven repository (online techpreview/all or offline zipped repository)
>>> plus Central and then in Quickstarts we use "another" repository.
>>>
>>> I agree that injected repository will help to an end user, but wouldn't
>>> it be simple just as one repository?
>>>
>>> you can easily manage versions in BOM imports etc. but for the learning
>>> purpose it can be confusing. WDYT?
>> Hmm. People are used to adding a second repo for snapshots, which is kinda
similar.
>>
> What are our target group of developers for quicksktarts? Newbies or
> experienced devs?
>
> I may see it more like short and simple bootstrap for newbies, but your
> view is probably different.
Agreed on newbies. Hence why we don’t want to make people add/remove repos, but have a
sensible default configured for them.
>
> --
> Marek Novotny
> --
> WFK and Seam Product Lead
>
> Red Hat Czech s.r.o.
> Purkynova 99
> 612 45 Brno
_______________________________________________
jbossdeveloper mailing list
jbossdeveloper(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossdeveloper