Rafael, I'm happy to help if I can. Ping me when you're ready and I'll
do what I can.
On 09/02/2014 04:32 PM, Rafael Benevides wrote:
Em 9/2/14, 17:27, Sande Gilda escreveu:
> Who does this?
It looks that it is under my responsibility. I though that it was part
of the productization procedure as WFK and forgot about this for EAP.
> Is this something I should be doing?
Nope.
> The archetypes are still using branch 6.2.x. Looks like we missed
> 6.3.x. :-(
I'll wait for the 6.2.0 to become available at
http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cga%7C1%7Corg.jboss.archetype.eap -
check the other Thread
then I'll work on 6.3.0 with the latest changes - synched with 6.3.0
Quickstarts and pom.xml injection.
and merge this PR
https://github.com/jboss-developer/jboss-stacks/pull/31 to stacks.yaml
>
> On 09/02/2014 10:53 AM, Rafael Benevides wrote:
>> yes. EAP Archetypes should be release together with EAP Quickstart.
>>
>> It already happens for WFK Archetypes..
>>
>> Em 9/2/14, 11:50, Sande Gilda escreveu:
>>> Thanks Rafael. That clarifies things.
>>>
>>> I've always been unclear about the Archetype releases. Do they
>>> coincide with the JBoss EAP release cycle or the JBoss Developer
>>> release cycle? When do we normally tag and branch? It seems like
>>> they are tightly coupled to the quickstarts, so should we be
>>> tagging, branching, and releasing them with the quickstarts?
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09/02/2014 10:38 AM, Rafael Benevides wrote:
>>>> It was changed on this commit at 11 Feb 2014 for EAP 6.2 :
>>>>
https://github.com/jboss-developer/jboss-eap-archetypes/commit/e9b78e807d...
>>>>
>>>> After that I sent several emails asking about the Archetype
>>>> productization release process and had no replies. So we haven't
>>>> any archetypes releases (but -build-x) after that as you can see
>>>> at:
>>>>
https://github.com/jboss-developer/jboss-eap-archetypes/commits/6.2.x-dev...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Em 9/2/14, 11:25, Sande Gilda escreveu:
>>>>> Rafael, when where the Archetypes changed? The JBoss EAP 6 Java
>>>>> EE Web Project doesn't do this in JBoss Tools 3.2.x or JBoss
>>>>> Developer Studio 7.1.GA.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 08/27/2014 01:29 PM, Rafael Benevides wrote:
>>>>>> We need also to consider that the actual generated project by
>>>>>> the latests Archetypes already uses <repository /> on its
pom.xml.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So I assume that we're already somehow encouraging them to do
it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> More inline..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Em 8/27/14, 13:26, Sande Gilda escreveu:
>>>>>>>> For our products we have the obligation to keep it for 5
>>>>>>>> years, so we already can't change the repo URL. Plus
the fact
>>>>>>>> that our quickstarts are not available through the Maven
Central.
>>>>>>> don't know where you get 5 years from - they need to be
much
>>>>>>> longer.
>>>>>> You're right. If we consider the ELS of some products it can
>>>>>> easily get more than 10 years!
>>>>>>> Anyway - I believe for the released runtime pom's we
cnanot add
>>>>>>> the repository urls but for the quickstart examples it is
okey
>>>>>>> because of the usability aspect.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>> /max
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>