Ref to the branches, I also think that we should do a cleanup removing - 6.2.x-develop - 6.3.x-develop - jdf-2.1.9.Final branches (keeping the tags) Btw, There's also a kitchensink-angularjs and wildfly branches that were not updated since last year. Anyone has any objections on removing theses branches ? Em 8/14/14, 16:04, Sande Gilda escreveu: > Rafael, that sounds great to me. > > Paul, does this work for you? > > On 08/14/2014 02:26 PM, Rafael Benevides wrote: >> I think we should tag the 6.3 quickstarts, then keep the same 6.3.x >> for EAP 6.3.1 and rename the 6.3.x-develop to 6.4.x-develop >> >> 6.3.x-develop -> rename to 6.4.x-develop >> 6.3.x -> keep it to EAP 6.3.1 >> >> That's what I think about it. >> >> >> Em 8/14/14, 14:33, Sande Gilda escreveu: >>> Now that JBoss EAP 6.3 is GA, do we need to tag the quickstarts and >>> create new branches for EAP 6.3.1 and EAP 6.4? It's so seldom we do >>> this that I forget! >>> >> >