Ref to the branches, I also think that we should do a cleanup removing
- 6.2.x-develop
- 6.3.x-develop
- jdf-2.1.9.Final
branches (keeping the tags)
Btw,
There's also a kitchensink-angularjs and wildfly branches that were not
updated since last year.
Anyone has any objections on removing theses branches ?
Em 8/14/14, 16:04, Sande Gilda escreveu:
Rafael, that sounds great to me.
Paul, does this work for you?
On 08/14/2014 02:26 PM, Rafael Benevides wrote:
> I think we should tag the 6.3 quickstarts, then keep the same 6.3.x
> for EAP 6.3.1 and rename the 6.3.x-develop to 6.4.x-develop
>
> 6.3.x-develop -> rename to 6.4.x-develop
> 6.3.x -> keep it to EAP 6.3.1
>
> That's what I think about it.
>
>
> Em 8/14/14, 14:33, Sande Gilda escreveu:
>> Now that JBoss EAP 6.3 is GA, do we need to tag the quickstarts and
>> create new branches for EAP 6.3.1 and EAP 6.4? It's so seldom we do
>> this that I forget!
>>
>