Re: [jdf-dev] -with-all BOM?

Sure! Let https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JDF-160 with me ;) Em 27-11-2012 13:19, Pete Muir escreveu: > Rafael, can you take this? > > On 27 Nov 2012, at 15:11, Marius Bogoevici wrote: > >> On 2012-11-23, at 7:30 AM, Pete Muir<pmuir(a)redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> As the number of BOM options grows, I wonder if we should offer an easy -with-all option? >>> >>> It could just import all the BOMs in the repo (this could even be a generated BOM to ensure it stays up to date). >>> >>> WDYT? >> I think it may be handy. >> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> jdf-dev mailing list >>> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev > _______________________________________________ > jdf-dev mailing list > jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev _______________________________________________ jdf-dev mailing list jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev