6:30 a.m.
As the number of BOM options grows, I wonder if we should offer an easy -with-all option?
It could just import all the BOMs in the repo (this could even be a generated BOM to
ensure it stays up to date).
WDYT?
9:11 a.m.
On 2012-11-23, at 7:30 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com> wrote:
As the number of BOM options grows, I wonder if we should offer an
easy -with-all option?
It could just import all the BOMs in the repo (this could even be a generated BOM to
ensure it stays up to date).
WDYT?
I think it may be handy.
_______________________________________________
jdf-dev mailing list
jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
9:19 a.m.
Rafael, can you take this?
On 27 Nov 2012, at 15:11, Marius Bogoevici wrote:
On 2012-11-23, at 7:30 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> As the number of BOM options grows, I wonder if we should offer an easy -with-all
option?
>
> It could just import all the BOMs in the repo (this could even be a generated BOM to
ensure it stays up to date).
>
> WDYT?
I think it may be handy.
> _______________________________________________
> jdf-dev mailing list
> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
12:21 p.m.
Sure!
Let https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JDF-160 with me ;)
Em 27-11-2012 13:19, Pete Muir escreveu:
Rafael, can you take this?
On 27 Nov 2012, at 15:11, Marius Bogoevici wrote:
> On 2012-11-23, at 7:30 AM, Pete Muir<pmuir(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> As the number of BOM options grows, I wonder if we should offer an easy -with-all
option?
>>
>> It could just import all the BOMs in the repo (this could even be a generated BOM
to ensure it stays up to date).
>>
>> WDYT?
> I think it may be handy.
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jdf-dev mailing list
>> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
_______________________________________________
jdf-dev mailing list
jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
10:41 a.m.
BOM 1.04.CR3 releases with -with-all BOM
Em 27-11-2012 16:21, Rafael Benevides escreveu:
Sure!
Let https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JDF-160 with me ;)
Em 27-11-2012 13:19, Pete Muir escreveu:
> Rafael, can you take this?
>
> On 27 Nov 2012, at 15:11, Marius Bogoevici wrote:
>
>> On 2012-11-23, at 7:30 AM, Pete Muir<pmuir(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> As the number of BOM options grows, I wonder if we should offer an easy
-with-all option?
>>>
>>> It could just import all the BOMs in the repo (this could even be a generated
BOM to ensure it stays up to date).
>>>
>>> WDYT?
>> I think it may be handy.
>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jdf-dev mailing list
>>> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
> _______________________________________________
> jdf-dev mailing list
> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
_______________________________________________
jdf-dev mailing list
jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
7:01 p.m.
+100.
On 11/23/2012 01:30 PM, Pete Muir wrote:
As the number of BOM options grows, I wonder if we should offer an
easy -with-all option?
It could just import all the BOMs in the repo (this could even be a generated BOM to
ensure it stays up to date).
WDYT?
_______________________________________________
jdf-dev mailing list
jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
4171
days inactive
4182
days old
5 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Marius Bogoevici -
Ondrej Zizka -
Pete Muir -
Rafael Benevides