Just one thing to add about a dependency too. Since the client wouldn't
really be a huge project, using the shade plugin would be easy enough
for anyone that doesn't want a dependency.
On 08/13/2012 08:31 AM, James Perkins wrote:
Most of the code was from that Parser. Rafael really deserves the
credit
for the code :-) I just copied it and I just refactored a bit was all. I
only renamed the Runtime class to ServerRuntime because IDEA kept
annoying me thinking I was trying to use java.lang.Runtime.
I normally don't like adding dependency, but in this case one needs to
be added for a YAML parser anyway. Adding one more to me isn't really a
big deal if it's more convenient.
On 08/13/2012 03:35 AM, Pete Muir wrote:
> Hey James,
>
> My initial proposal was to create a "reference client", that would be
really simple. Rafael implemented it in ~550 LOC -
https://github.com/jboss-jdf/jdf-stack/blob/master/Parser.java as I know that adding
dependencies can get really complex (e.g. consider someone using JBDS and Forge together,
and both using different versions of the client. Then this reference client can be copied
in, and used.
>
> However, obviously we really want to do what makes most sense for the people who will
use the client:
>
> * JBoss AS Maven plugin
> * JBoss AS Forge plugin
> * JBoss AS Eclipse plugin
> * Arquillian (not discussed this one so far, but probably useful ;-)
>
> So, I guess we should call a vote :-)
>
> Who would prefer a dependency over a copy and paste? Please respond!
>
> On 11 Aug 2012, at 01:00, James Perkins wrote:
>
>> I've been working on getting stacks integrated with the maven plugin for the
run goal. While doing this I got to wondering if we should have a stacks client. I believe
Pete may have mentioned something about not wanting one, but it just seems we'll end
up with a bunch of duplicate code.
>>
>> I've created a quick prototype
https://github.com/jamezp/jdf-stack-client. It
would need some work and could probably be made a little more generic for integrating with
tooling, but it's just a PoC so far.
>>
>> Any thoughts or opinions about having a client available?
>> --
>> James R. Perkins
>> JBoss by Red Hat
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jdf-dev mailing list
>> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
--
James R. Perkins
JBoss by Red Hat