Re: [jdf-dev] Stacks 1.1 format proposal

If you want to update the format, why not do that in a new branch?

Also, perhaps it would help if you listed your goals for using the new format? What problems do you hope to solve? What is the value?

~Lincoln ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From: *"Rafael Benevides" <benevides(a)redhat.com&gt; *To: *"Fred Bricon" <fbricon(a)redhat.com&gt; *Cc: *"jdf-dev" <jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt;, "Max Rydahl Andersen" <max.andersen(a)redhat.com&gt;, "Peter Muir" <pmuir(a)redhat.com&gt;, "Lincoln Baxter" <lbaxter(a)redhat.com&gt;, "George Gastaldi" <ggastald(a)redhat.com&gt;, "Max Rydahl Andersen" <manderse(a)redhat.com&gt; *Sent: *Thursday, August 22, 2013 11:29:49 AM *Subject: *Re: [jdf-dev] Stacks 1.1 format proposal Ok. - Considering that we can't/won't remove the branch - Considering that JBT/JBDS works fine with the github organization change/move. Should we also maintain the 1.0 content for how long ? *I'm questioning it to feel how does it worth to update the format instead of using the workarounds*. From my point of view, I'm just trying to get the opportunity about the organization change to update also the format (if it has demand for it). *Otherwise (if we don't want/need) the format change I think we can survive with the workarounds proposed: * - Rename Licenses to Metadata: *Leave it as is* - Add repositoryURL to BOMs: *use labels for it as it is today. *I'd like to here comments about the worth of change or not because I'm really getting convinced that this isn't wanted/needed/welcome :) Em 22/08/13 12:13, Fred Bricon escreveu: Btw, For how long time we should maintain the stacks format 1.0 ? Till the end of times. Seriously. You can't break existing JBT/JBDS or other users who can't upgrade for one reason or another.