Re: [jdf-dev] Picketlink version on EAP BOMs
IMO let's add the -with-security BOM only for EAP 6.2
On 9 Sep 2013, at 22:33, Pedro Igor Silva <psilva(a)redhat.com> wrote:
As we discussed, 6.1 is shipped with PicketLink 2.1.
The artifacts available with the Security BOM are for 2.5 (eg.: picketlink-api,
picketlink-impl). So I'm not sure if makes sense to have those artifacts as they
don't exist with 2.1.
Users using 6.1 are PicketLink Federation users, which in most cases is just a matter of
the PicketLink modules usage. But some times, users want to extend PicketLink Federation
features and for that they need the 2.1 libraries on the classpath of their applications.
Wondering if is better to change EAP 6.1 BOMs to match 2.1 artifacts.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rafael Benevides" <benevides(a)redhat.com>
To: "Pedro Igor" <psilva(a)redhat.com>, "Anil Saldhana"
<asaldhan(a)redhat.com>, "Peter Skopek" <pskopek(a)redhat.com>,
"Marek Novotný" <mnovotny(a)redhat.com>, "Peter Muir"
<pmuir(a)redhat.com>, "jdf-dev" <jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Monday, September 9, 2013 6:12:54 PM
Subject: Re: Picketlink version on EAP BOMs
Adding Pedro Igor...
Em 09/09/13 17:36, Rafael Benevides escreveu:
> Hi all,
>
> We released today the EAP BOMs version 6.2.0-redhat-1 with Picketlink
> 2.5.1.
>
> Under EAP BOMs we will maintain for now two branches: 6.2.x and 6.1.x
>
> I was wondering that our branch 6.1.x should be fixed with the right
> EAP 6.1.x version: Picketlink 2.1.6.
>
> Today I talked to Pedro Igor who told me that it seems a not easy job
> to have the -with-security BOM for EAP 6.1.x/PL 2.16 for many reason
> that he can explain better than me.
>
> Another approach that I'd like to query everyone is the possibility to
> remove -with-security BOM from EAP 6.1.x if it is not possible to have
> this BOM working fine for EAP 6.1.x
>
> I expected to hear your comments about the desired/right way to have
> EAP 6.1.x BOM with -with-security/Picketlink BOM.
>
> Thanks
>