All,
I added the archetypes info on Stacks page.
I tried 3 different approaches to show the Archetypes:
- Archetypes on another page (information became diffuse)
- Tree Table (too confusing, polluted)
- Overlay (actual - I liked that)
I took a link to
Rafael Benevides | Senior Software Engineer
Red Hat Brazil
+55-61-9269-6576
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at
Thanks for your tips Pete. It was really awesome
New release - with your commits rebased :) - to review
<
http://localhost:4242/stack/runtimes/>http://site-jdf.rhcloud.com/stac...
Rafael Benevides | Senior Software Engineer
Red Hat Brazil
+55-61-9269-6576
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at
redhat.com
Em 25-07-2012 07:26, Pete Muir escreveu:
>
Onhttp://site-jdf.rhcloud.com/stack/boms/
>
> * the code samplle indentation is probably wrong, I think it should just be left
aligned.
> * You have a trailing full stop in the code sample
> * Maybe we should experiment with a table for the layout, rather than the accordion?
not sure.
> * the "Description:" is probably redundant, the layout of the page makes it
obvious that it's a description ;-)
> * maybe we should make the Usage h3 or h4, it's a bit distracting right now
> * We've lost the info on plugins needing to be copied in from the BOMs readmes
>
>
Onhttp://site-jdf.rhcloud.com/stack/runtimes/
>
> * I would prefer to present this all in one table, rather than multiple tabs by type
> * We should present newest server first, not last (descending order)
> * Normally the code name of the server goes in parentheses
> * Links to BOMs should open the right accordion/tab
> * I wonder if we should call it "Suggested Runtime" "Suggested
BOM", "Suggested Archetype"
> * Download URL isn't a URL, it's a link. Suggest you change to
"Download" and then use one of the glyphicons for in the table
> * I would like to be able to expand a row, and see all the available BOMs and
archetypes, and also all available versions of said BOMs and archetypes
>
>
http://site-jdf.rhcloud.com/stack/plugin-jdf/
>
> * Something has gone wrong with the markdown, links aren't being correctly
created
> * I'll send a pull with some suggested changes to the README source
>
> On 25 Jul 2012, at 02:24, Rafael Benevides wrote:
>
>> Hi ALL
>>
>> After digging the awestruct/ruby/haml world I update the JDF site to read the
jboss-stack yaml file
>>
>> So I created a new section named JBoss Stacks that's what we have been
calling it.
>>
>> This new section contains:
>> - The JBoss boms (from yaml file
-https://github.com/jboss-jdf/jdf-stack/blob/Beta2/stacks.yaml)
>> - The Runtime matrix (Major Releases, Minor Releases and some Runtime data -
also read from yaml file)
>> - A page about JDF plugin (from README.md)
>> - PLANED: Archetypes data
>>
>> This new section is
athttp://site-jdf.rhcloud.com/stack/boms/ - I'll thank
for any review and just to know: My designer skill is terrible :p
>>
>>
>> P.S: Pete Muir heard something about "JBoss Stacks" is an overloaded
name. I don't think that we should change it but if someone have any name idea, it
will be welcome.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Rafael Benevides | Senior Software Engineer
>> Red Hat Brazil
>> +55-61-9269-6576
>>
>> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
>> See how it works at
redhat.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jdf-dev mailing list
>> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
_______________________________________________
jdf-dev mailing list
jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev