Re: [jdf-dev] (no subject)

I think that pretty much solidifies it then. On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 19:11 -0400, Marius Bogoevici wrote: > We actually use Hibernate Validator extensions for core (i.e. non-Errai) stuff in TiMo and IIRC even in quick starts. > > e.g. @Email validation. > > On 2012-06-13, at 6:53 PM, Jason Porter wrote: > >> I'm working on an example that will use DeltaSpike. I'm looking at using >> some Hibernate APIs (Envers, and some of the validators from Hibernate >> Validator). Does anyone see a problem with this? The way I've thought >> of jdf is not just to say here's how to do Java EE (which what we have >> far better than what Oracle puts out), but also how we're extending the >> platform and doing things that aren't part of the standard yet. Yes, >> this ties you to our stuff, but in a way, isn't that what we want? We >> want people to see what you can do with Java that is beyond the spec >> using our stuff. Sure, you could stay with the standards and use only >> the specs, but you can do so much more with some of the extras we >> provide. >> >> We have also done this with Errai in TicketMonster. I don't see this >> being much of a problem. >> _______________________________________________ >> jdf-dev mailing list >> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev >