I sent the following PR:
https://github.com/jboss/ide-config/pull/6
to update the templates since we instruct on our contributing guide to use the
ide-config.
I added Jay Balunas to this Thread so he can be aware why this PR was sent.
Em 18/02/13 19:04, Pete Muir escreveu:
> We should get all license headers updated, including templates etc.
>
> On 18 Feb 2013, at 21:29, Rafael Benevides <benevides(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> In this case what's supposed to happen if the jboss ide templates and
>> other quickstarts that doesn't follow our contributing guide?
>>
>> The tool is checking today using our license header as the only valid
>> header.
>>
>> Em 18/02/13 18:23, Pete Muir escreveu:
>>> The license we recommend people to use in our CONTRIBUTING.md is approved by
legal.
>>>
>>> On 18 Feb 2013, at 20:48, Sande Gilda <sgilda(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is there a version of the license that has been approved by legal? For
>>>> example, I noticed some of these have a year, some have a variable
>>>> '${year}, and some have no year.
>>>>
>>>> On 02/18/2013 03:20 PM, Jason Porter wrote:
>>>>> Inline
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>> From: "Rafael Benevides" <benevides(a)redhat.com>
>>>>>> To: "jdf-dev" <jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
>>>>>> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 12:56:05 PM
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [jdf-dev] Quickstarts and Tooling Automation -
License Header
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The License Header check is on the way. But I have some thoughts
that
>>>>>> I would like to share and ask your opinion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - I'm using the Checkstyle API to verify for the License
Header. Even
>>>>>> using RegexpHeader, the check is made line by line. " Checks
the
>>>>>> header of a source file against a header that contains a regular
>>>>>> expression for each line of the source header." (
>>>>>>
http://checkstyle.sourceforge.net/config_header.html )
>>>>> Gotta ask why you're using the regexp version and not the file
version. I've found the regexp one to be a pain to maintain long term, but I suppose
it *can* less restrictive based on how you craft your rexegp.
>>>>>
>>>>>> - We instruct the users to use some specific headers:
>>>>>>
http://www.jboss.org/jdf/quickstarts/get-involved/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - We also instructs the users to use the following ide
>>>>>> templates/format but these templates differ from what we
propose:
>>>>>>
https://github.com/jboss/ide-config/blob/master/eclipse/jboss-java-templa...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Some quickstarts comming from other repos have their header
>>>>>> modified like on this commit:
>>>>>>
https://github.com/jboss-jdf/jboss-as-quickstart/commit/605d877b38f280a32...
>>>>> Personally if we're seeing changes like this with a license
I'd flag it and get it fixed.
>>>>>
>>>>>> So I ask you what should be better to use on the quickstarts
tools ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1 - Make IDE/JDF Site similar and refactor all non-compliant
>>>>>> quickstarts? (Inflexible)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2 - Use another plugin
http://code.google.com/p/maven-license-plugin/
>>>>>> that has the feature to include many distinguished and valid
headers
>>>>>> (Less restrictive)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 3 - Manually check if the first lines of the file contains the
>>>>>> following patterns: "JBoss, Home of Professional Open
Source" and
>>>>>> "Licensed under the Apache License" (Almost without
restrictions on
>>>>>> format)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Until what point should we be too restrictive or not for this
>>>>>> checking ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Em 14/02/13 18:25, Rafael Benevides escreveu:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> JDF is growing each day. As a consequence, keep the quickstarts
>>>>>> consistent is becoming a hard work.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To mitigate this and help the maintenance of the quickstart and
also
>>>>>> to help the contributors to see if their quickstarts are ready
to
>>>>>> review, we are planning and starting the development of a
tooling
>>>>>> for quickstart automation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This tool will make use of some other well know and opensource
>>>>>> projects like PMD (
pmd.sf.net), checkstyke (
checkstyle.sf.net),
>>>>>> Maven Enforcer plugin, etc to attend the following requirements:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * Validating quickstart POM files:
>>>>>> * Check for the License header ( checkstyle headers )
>>>>>> * Check for proper spacing and Indentation (try
checkstyle -
>>>>>> whitespace rule and indentation rule )
>>>>>> * Check and verify if all quickstarts are using the
>>>>>> same/latest BOM versions
>>>>>> * Verify is it using the standard properties names (We
will
>>>>>> provide the standard properties name)
>>>>>> * Check for non bom versions (and identify if we should
>>>>>> create a new BOM)
>>>>>> * Check javascript and css versions
>>>>>> * Check for duplicate properties and dependencies
>>>>>> * Check the pom.xml elements order
>>>>>> * Create scripts to update versions (quickstart, boms,
etc)
>>>>>> * When a new quickstart is added, if it has a pom.xml
file,
>>>>>> make sure the <module> is defined in one of the
following
>>>>>> profiles: default, requires-postgres,
complex-dependencies,
>>>>>> requires-full, requires-xts, non-maven.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * Validating quickstart README files:
>>>>>> * Check for the required metadata tags in README (Level,
>>>>>> Author, Target Product, etc)
>>>>>> * Verify the quickstart name in the README matches the
folder
>>>>>> name and the project name
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * Validating quickstart source code
>>>>>> * Check the quantity of comments in the code (evaluate
PMD )
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * General validation (desired):
>>>>>> * If a quickstart with a source other than the current
>>>>>> repository is modified, create an alert of some sort so
we
>>>>>> can notify the upstream repository of the change.
>>>>>> * When we update a BOM property version in the
quickstarts,
>>>>>> we need to make the same changes in the archetypes.
>>>>>> * Also, if there is a code fix in the kitchensink or
>>>>>> kitchensink-ear, we need to make the same fix in the
>>>>>> archetype code and check other quickstarts based on the
same
>>>>>> archetype to see if they need the fixes applied.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you have some comments, I will be glad to hear you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Rafael Benevides | Senior Software Engineer
>>>>>> Red Hat Brazil
>>>>>> +55-61-9269-6576
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community
>>>>>> collaboration.
>>>>>> See how it works at
redhat.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> jdf-dev mailing list
>>>>>> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> jdf-dev mailing list
>>>>> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> jdf-dev mailing list
>>>> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jdf-dev mailing list
>>> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> jdf-dev mailing list
>> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev