There's no problem AFAIK, however, the Fedora Java guys are looking to package things
up in Fedora (and that will probably make its way to RHEL) and they're much better off
to use all jars from a single source. Right now that single source looks to be Geromino
instead of JBoss.
----- Paul Gier <pgier(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi Pete,
By missing, do you mean APIs jars that come from thirdparty? I believe
our BOM has all the APIs, there is just a split between the jars built
as part of the JBoss specs project vs. built by thirdparties.
You can see the split in the specs BOM here:
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/jboss/spec/jboss-javaee-6.0/3.0.1.Final...
I'm not sure if we'll have time to re-create the remaining thirdparty
ones, it's pretty low priority. What's the problem that they cause
currently?
On 07/09/2012 05:17 PM, Pete Muir wrote:
> Hey Shelly, Paul,
>
> I know we are missing a few of these, and for consistency/one less FAQ, it would be
nice to have a complete set.
>
> WDYT? Do you guys have time to "finish this off" over the next month or
two?
>
> Pete
>
_______________________________________________
jdf-dev mailing list
jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev