I have no problem with this. It'll probably make them easier for people to find.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pete Muir" <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
To: jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Cc: "Joshua Wilson" <jowilson(a)redhat.com>
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 8:35:46 AM
Subject: [jdf-dev] Fwd: Changing the name of the Spring Quickstarts
Forwarding to jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Begin forwarded message:
From: Joshua Wilson < jowilson(a)redhat.com >
Subject: Changing the name of the Spring Quickstarts
Date: 13 January 2014 15:33:54 GMT
To: "'Pete Muir'" < pmuir(a)redhat.com >, < sme-jdf(a)redhat.com
>
Cc: "'Burr Sutter'" < bsutter(a)redhat.com >, "'Vineet
Reynolds Pereira'" <
vpereira(a)redhat.com >
Does anyone have any concerns or issues with changing the names of all the
Spring Quickstarts to start with ‘Spring-‘? Most notably this will affect
the kitchensink ones as it take any kitchensink spring quickstarts out of
the order of the rest of them.
I am purposing the following:
kitchensink-spring-basic -> spring-kitchensink-basic
My thought is that it would help anyone looking for spring related
quickstarts better able to find them. My concern is that I am not entirely
sure it is worth it to interrupt the flow/order of the list.
What do you all think?
--
Joshua Wilson
Senior Software Engineer
Jboss by Red Hat
Mobile: 843-727-5277
josh(a)redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com
_______________________________________________
jdf-dev mailing list
jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev