Yeah, we can't just display the URL, we need to give the URL an href and a value e.g.
<a
I don't think we need to add a URL for those that are in jdf itself.
If we're concerned about space, this could just go in the README
i.e
I like the idea of adding the 'Origin:' metadata tag. I was
thinking github too, but it will take up a lot of space in the table. Is there a link on
the Aerogear site to the quickstarts? If not, should we add the github URL for all of
them?
On 08/17/2012 07:55 AM, Pete Muir wrote:
> That's totally up to you :-)
>
> On 17 Aug 2012, at 12:52, Jay Balunas wrote:
>
>> On Aug 17, 2012, at 7:51 AM, Pete Muir wrote:
>>
>>> We generate the quickstart table using the "metadata" at the top of
the README files like:
>>>
>>> Author: Pete Muir
>>> Level: Beginner
>>> Technologies: Aerogear, CDI
>>>
>>> So, we could add a tag like:
>>>
>>> Origin: [Aerogear](http://aerogear.org)
>>>
>>> WDYT?
>> Wouldn't it point to the git repo it merged from?
>>
>> but otherwise yes, this would work.
>>
>>> On 17 Aug 2012, at 12:45, Jay Balunas wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 makes sense to me!
>>>>
>>>> I would say in the README and in the quickstart table.
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 16, 2012, at 9:28 AM, Sande Gilda wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> There are a few quickstarts in
>>>>>
https://github.com/jboss-jdf/jboss-as-quickstart that originate from
>>>>> other repositories. Except for urgent problems, fixes are made in
the
>>>>> originating repository and are merged into jboss-as-quickstart. We
>>>>> currently merge in quickstarts from Aerogear and RichFaces, and now
>>>>> we're adding JDG quickstarts.
>>>>>
>>>>> Should we indicate the originating source for these merged
quickstarts
>>>>> somewhere? I think it would be useful for developers who want to keep
up
>>>>> with the latest changes and fixes. It would also be helpful for us
for
>>>>> tracking purposes. If we want the originating source to appear in
the
>>>>> quickstart table, we could even add it to the "Summary".
>>>>>
>>>>> Jay and Brian, you've been merging quickstarts for a while. What
do you
>>>>> think?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Sande
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> jdf-dev mailing list
>>>>> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> jdf-dev mailing list
>>>> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev