But I don't have a better answer right now. I'm just calling it out as a (major)
issue.
On 13 Aug 2012, at 16:39, Pete Muir wrote:
I really don't like keeping the project files in SCM.
On 13 Aug 2012, at 14:24, Marius Bogoevici wrote:
> All,
>
> I added a candidate structure for the hybridized TicketMonster - it's based on
the Aerogear kitchensink with the added twist that we keep separate index files for each
device, and then refer directly to those files from the wrapper code. While not ideal,
this allows to keep separate configurations (i.e. dependencies for each device) and avoid
manual changes after opening a particular device project.
>
> An alternative would be to use maven to construct target/www-<device> folders
and use symlinks to those. I don't like it because
>
> - doesn't work well with the web configurations;
> - you can't easily create fixes from Xcode/Android SDK to the web app code,
because you need to run the build phase manually after.
>
> Let the reviews begin!
>
> Here it is:
>
https://github.com/jboss-jdf/ticket-monster/pull/6
> _______________________________________________
> jdf-dev mailing list
> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
_______________________________________________
jdf-dev mailing list
jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev