Re: [jdf-dev] [new organization] BOMs repository split

Both mixins and inheritance are supported. On 5 Jul 2013, at 17:31, Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org&gt; wrote: > I don't know. Can you mixin BOMs or are they rigidly hierarchical? > > On 5 juil. 2013, at 18:09, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> So, do we have a -with-hibernate-orm and -with-hibernate-search BOM? >> >> On 5 Jul 2013, at 16:40, Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org&gt; wrote: >> >>> On Fri 2013-07-05 11:47, Rafael Benevides wrote: >>>> As part of the plan, the BOMs will be splited according to its product: >>>> EAP or WFK >>>> >>>> Today there are some BOMs that is distributed in both products. My >>>> question is what we should do about them? Move it to EAP or move it to WFK? >>>> >>>> The worst if keeping it in both repos. >>>> >>>> These are the boms that have release on eap 6.1 and wfk 2.2 >>>> >>>> - with-deltaspike >>>> - with-errai >>>> - with-hibernate >>> >>> With Hibernate ORM being at the center of EAP's persistence >>> implementation, ORM should be in a BOM shared by anyone seeding off EAP. >>> >>> Hibernate Search being used by WFK, Data Services and JBoss Data Grid >>> it's quite more complicated but again some "common libs" used by a >>> common set of versions of EAP, WFK and SOA. >>> But I'm sure, at least initially that we will need to have some >>> exceptions esp until the search support for JDG matures enough. >>> >>> It's somehow tied ot the layered architecture and the idea of a core >>> shared by compatible platforms. >>> >>> That's a general view but we should discuss on email (or if we have to >>> on a call) the exact requirements and needs of these BOMs to come to the >>> proper solution. >>> >>> Emmanuel >>> _______________________________________________ >>> jdf-dev mailing list >>> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev >>