Is B not the install script that installs jars directly into the mvn repo with conflicting
GAV's or have that been fixed ?
Asking since I thought the idea with jdf examples were that they didn't encourage bad
practices and was based on supported artifacts,
and if something can't provide that these examples should be in the sandbox until
solved.
(in case I read the mail thread wrong and these examples actually are just in sandbox for
now then sorry for the noise - github is all unicorns right now so can't check :/
/max
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:17:40AM -0300, Rafael Benevides wrote:
Thanks guys for the help!
I'll use B.
Em 25/07/13 07:54, Pete Muir escreveu:
> Agree, we should use B for now, until the 6 series is available. We don't want to
merge this down to master until that point anyway.
>
> On 25 Jul 2013, at 11:44, "Eric D. Schabell" <erics(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>
>> Hi Rafel,
>>
>> There is no plan to have a BRMS 5.x maven central repo. Never was.
>>
>> I worked with Geoffrey in the Drools team to put together the BOM you find in my
projects and the scripted extraction of the maven artifacts and installing these locally
is just like it will be once provided by BRMS/BPMS 6.x.
>>
>> As to your possible solutions:
>>
>> A - not a good way to go for the product direction we want to show with the
quickstarts. Also community is too volatile to maintain your quickstarts on, there would
be a lot of component integration issues, I promise you.
>>
>> B - I would stick with this just for the BRMS 5.x series, later we can move away
from this as you see fit.
>>
>> C - doubt you will find any.
>>
>> Hope this helps? I sort of went through all of these problems during creation of
these, starting with no maven projects and slowly working through to get them in the state
they are in now, sort of mavenized. ;)
>>
>> -- erics
>>
>> On Jul 24, 2013, at 23:37 , Rafael Benevides <benevides(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Updating the info,
>>>
>>> I confirmed with Petr Siroky (added to this Thread) that there isn't an
available online Maven repo except behind the VPN
(
http://download.devel.redhat.com/brewroot/repos/soa-brms-5.3-updates-buil...)
>>>
>>> I think he have to take a decision on how to treat this. Possible solutions:
>>>
>>> A - Move to Community Artifacts (so we can use -with-drools BOM and Maven
Central repository)
>>> B - Use Eric install script which works fine but the setup and the folder
structure of the quickstart will not be close as we have on other JDF quickstarts
>>> B.1 - Add the project under ' complex-dependencies' Maven Profile:
https://github.com/jboss-jdf/jboss-as-quickstart/blob/master/pom.xml#L266
>>> C - Choose or Think in another way to have the BRMS 5.3.1 maven artifacts
available
>>>
>>> I think that A is the easy way but I don't know if it is the desired.
>>>
>>> Still waiting for comments.
>>>
>>> Em 24/07/13 17:16, Rafael Benevides escreveu:
>>>> I'm working on this quickstart
>>>>
>>>>
https://github.com/eschabell/brms-customer-evaluation-demo
>>>> and I'm
>>>> facing the following:
>>>>
>>>> - This quickstart is target to BRMS 5.3.1
>>>> - BRMS 5.3.1 doesn't have its Maven artifacts online at:
>>>>
>>>>
http://maven.repository.redhat.com/techpreview/
>>>>
>>>> - This quickstart uses a manual script to install those artifacts
>>>> locally (
>>>>
>>>>
https://github.com/eschabell/brms-customer-evaluation-demo/blob/master/in...
>>>>
>>>> )
>>>> - Quickstarts should use Maven Central or an online Maven repo, right ?
>>>> - This quickstart doesn't use BOMs
>>>> - We have a -with-drools BOM that is target to Drools community project
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Questions:
>>>> - Is there another online repo for BRMS 5.3.1 in another place than
>>>>
>>>>
http://maven.repository.redhat.com/techpreview/
>>>> ?
>>>> - If there isn't an online repo for BRMS 5.3.1, Should we Downgrade
this
>>>> quickstart to BRMS 5.3.0 (delivered on WFK 2.3)?
>>>> - If Downgrade, what about JBPM releases (we don't have
>>>> org.jbpm on
>>>>
http://maven.repository.redhat.com/techpreview/
>>>> ) ?
>>>> - Another possible path: Should we target this quickstart to Community
>>>> or this is not desired?
>>>>
>>>> Comments:
>>>> - It seems that there isn't any BRMS Product Bom at the moment.
So
>>>> it will not be using BOMs with we target to Product
>>>> - If target to Community, we can add everything we need in
>>>> -with-drools BOM
>>>>
>>>> I appreciate any comments on this
>>>>
>>>>
_______________________________________________
jdf-dev mailing list
jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev