Re: [keycloak-user] Java 11 (Docker container base)

Sebastian, The link [1] only shows support on RHEL and Windows environments. Do you mean to say the 2023 date is also valid for OpenJDK running in the Docker-version of Keycloak, regardless of underlying architecture? [1] https://access.redhat.com/articles/1299013 Chris > >From the support perspective, Red Hat offers extended support till June > 2023 [1]. > > Our move towards JDK11 (LTS) relies heavily on Wildfly/EAP Team. I guess we > still have plenty of time to do the switch, so I wouldn't rush things too > much. > > BTW, why do you need JDK11, especially in the container? > > [1] https://access.redhat.com/articles/1299013 > >> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 1:13 PM Pavel Micka <Pavel.Micka at zoomint.com> wrote: >> >> Sorry, end of january (my fault): >> https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html. Then Oracle Java >> and OpenJDK will most probably start to diverge, as OpenJDK will not have >> access to Oracle repos (afaik). So the speed of security fixes will depend >> on willigness of community to fix the upcomming issues. >> >> Pavel >> >> >> From: Meissa M'baye Sakho <msakho at redhat.com> >> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 11:04 AM >> To: Pavel Micka <Pavel.Micka at zoomint.com> >> Cc: keycloak-user <keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org> >> Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Java 11 (Docker container base) >> >> Hello, >> Pavel, where did you get the information that the official Java 8 support >> will cease at the end of december? >> https://access.redhat.com/articles/1299013 >> https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/eol-135779.html >> Meissa >> >> Le lun. 22 oct. 2018 à 16:33, Pavel Micka <Pavel.Micka at zoomint.com<mailto: >> Pavel.Micka at zoomint.com>> a écrit : >> Hello everyone, >> >> What is the plan for Java 11 support? The point is that current versions >> of Docker containers are based on OpenJDK 8, but the official Java 8 >> support will cease at the end of December. Will Keycloak use Java 11 by >> that time or will it rely on updates provided by the community. >> >> This is important to us, as Keycloak is important part of our app security. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Pavel >> >> // I have found this ticket in Jira, but it does not provide too many >> details: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-7811 >> _______________________________________________ >> keycloak-user mailing list >> keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org<mailto:keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user >> _______________________________________________ >> keycloak-user mailing list >> keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user _______________________________________________ keycloak-user mailing list keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user