Hi, We're thinking on using Keycloak as our main IDP and SSO solution. At this time, we're using a "custom" IDP server based on Spring and we are investigating if we can migrate our client database to Keycloak without disturbing our users. So, we have seen that, by default, Keycloak answers a token request with a complete JWT token, like this one: { "access_token": "eyJhbGciOiJSUzI1NiIsInR5cCIgOiAiSldUIiwia2lkIiA6ICJEWk4wX1liZUZGNFZMUVdxQ2NWMGFWd0VFbXBlUGlnX1NFaWk3dkozSGRvIn0.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! LjEiLCJjbGllbnRJZCI6Imh0dCtxMklHWUJBRzhwZEwxeGxxeDNMcWtXbXIiLCJwcmVmZXJyZWRfdXNlcm5hbWUiOiJzZXJ2aWNlLWFjY291bnQtaHR0K3EyaWd5YmFnOHBkbDF4bHF4M2xxa3dtciIsImNsaWVudEFkZHJlc3MiOiIxNzIuMTguMC4xIiwiZW1haWwiOiJzZXJ2aWNlLWFjY291bnQtaHR0K3EyaWd5YmFnOHBkbDF4bHF4M2xxa3dtckBwbGFjZWhvbGRlci5vcmcifQ.BgF6v7VQGO4vH4Z0VLFZmiO1CARpaoE1V7MjaNIJB85QORfk3L431VFQr3WJdT5ZBeC0Q5mB5LB7f9gLAd2lso4P9AegYAi8PmjJRvI-oL59Qe0PfDn8fjfZdaC8i3K0ZrZNDS9ivTdqL-8Gvq2C1l8x4tZaSxw1Yu8hxrWEfgOfATdn9XL5cbYXWRkm6AoJkVFVd300fPr0k6f67Jb4WOJP72692g8QRTWkqCrZyz0DrJxgg7fSX6M_0bxOa-JOidmGuJIwScciT1b5IVvvcQi3hx4UMwRQFunq1j2T7iRCT_LB99oP480KtoSXyCUS3dDzj6wCp4BEHb5K792isg" , "expires_in": 300, "refresh_expires_in": 1800, "refresh_token": "eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCIgOiAiSldUIiwia2lkIiA6ICJhNmQzZTgzZi1iZGUxLTQ3YjgtYmQ4Yy1hMjVhNDdjMmExZTYifQ.eyJqdGkiOiJmZWZhNTRjZS1hMjA0LTQ2NjAtODNkMC1kNDE0OWQwOTU0YWMiLCJleHAiOjE1NDM1NzQ2MDgsIm5iZiI6MCwiaWF0IjoxNTQzNTcyODA4LCJpc3MiOiJodHRwOi8vMTcyLjE4LjAuMzo4MDgwL2F1dGgvcmVhbG1zL3Rlc3QtcmVhbG0iLCJhdWQiOiJodHRwOi8vMTcyLjE4LjAuMzo4MDgwL2F1dGgvcmVhbG1zL3Rlc3QtcmVhbG0iLCJzdWIiOiJjODE3NjM2OC0wYjk1LTQxYWYtODNkNS1lOTg3ZjRlZWVhODciLCJ0eXAiOiJSZWZyZXNoIiwiYXpwIjoiaHR0K3EySUdZQkFHOHBkTDF4bHF4M0xxa1dtciIsImF1dGhfdGltZSI6MCwic2Vzc2lvbl9zdGF0ZSI6IjcyZWNiNzk4LWRiNTgtNDE2MS04ZTA5LTRhYWVkYjJlYWI4ZiIsInJlYWxtX2FjY2VzcyI6eyJyb2xlcyI6WyJvZmZsaW5lX2FjY2VzcyIsInVtYV9hdXRob3JpemF0aW9uIl19LCJyZXNvdXJjZV9hY2Nlc3MiOnsiaHR0K3EySUdZQkFHOHBkTDF4bHF4M0xxa1dtciI6eyJyb2xlcyI6WyJ1bWFfcHJvdGVjdGlvbiJdfSwiYWNjb3VudCI6eyJyb2xlcyI6WyJtYW5hZ2UtYWNjb3VudCIsIm1hbmFnZS1hY2NvdW50LWxpbmtzIiwidmlldy1wcm9maWxlIl19fSwic2NvcGUiOiJwcm9maWxlIGVtYWlsIn0.WTW9TwMnx4DSzRlLkDj_uXgabFAAUD4wDB5D084GMdY" , "token_type": "bearer", "not-before-policy": 0, "session_state": "72ecb798-db58-4161-8e09-4aaedb2eab8f", "scope": "profile email" } But, we'd like to send a "non-JWT" token, like this one: { "access_token": "laskddjfnasdf7-fas45nfdsa-56kr-8uy7-fasd87fyasdf", "token_type": "bearer", "expires_in": 3600, "scope": "scope-1 scope-2 scope-n" } We're not very experienced in Keycloak and we do not know if this is even possible, but any help will make us very happy. Thanks in advance! Regards, _______________________________________________ keycloak-user mailing list keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user

Hello Francisco, Perhaps you need to implement your own client authenticator [1] Hoe it helps, Luis [1] https://www.keycloak.org/docs/latest/server_development/index.html#implem... El sáb., 1 dic. 2018 a las 13:48, Geoffrey Cleaves (<geoff(a)opticks.io>) escribió: > I think from my limited knowledge that the OpenId standard dictates the > use > of JWT tokens, so I would not expect this to be possible. > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018, 11:25 Francisco Javier Crujeiras < > fj.crujeiras(a)hocelot.com wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We're thinking on using Keycloak as our main IDP and SSO solution. At > this > > time, we're using a "custom" IDP server based on Spring and we are > > investigating if we can migrate our client database to Keycloak without > > disturbing our users. > > > > So, we have seen that, by default, Keycloak answers a token request > with a > > complete JWT token, like this one: > > { > > "access_token": > > > > > "eyJhbGciOiJSUzI1NiIsInR5cCIgOiAiSldUIiwia2lkIiA6ICJEWk4wX1liZUZGNFZMUVdxQ2NWMGFWd0VFbXBlUGlnX1NFaWk3dkozSGRvIn0.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! > 4w! > > > > > LjEiLCJjbGllbnRJZCI6Imh0dCtxMklHWUJBRzhwZEwxeGxxeDNMcWtXbXIiLCJwcmVmZXJyZWRfdXNlcm5hbWUiOiJzZXJ2aWNlLWFjY291bnQtaHR0K3EyaWd5YmFnOHBkbDF4bHF4M2xxa3dtciIsImNsaWVudEFkZHJlc3MiOiIxNzIuMTguMC4xIiwiZW1haWwiOiJzZXJ2aWNlLWFjY291bnQtaHR0K3EyaWd5YmFnOHBkbDF4bHF4M2xxa3dtckBwbGFjZWhvbGRlci5vcmcifQ.BgF6v7VQGO4vH4Z0VLFZmiO1CARpaoE1V7MjaNIJB85QORfk3L431VFQr3WJdT5ZBeC0Q5mB5LB7f9gLAd2lso4P9AegYAi8PmjJRvI-oL59Qe0PfDn8fjfZdaC8i3K0ZrZNDS9ivTdqL-8Gvq2C1l8x4tZaSxw1Yu8hxrWEfgOfATdn9XL5cbYXWRkm6AoJkVFVd300fPr0k6f67Jb4WOJP72692g8QRTWkqCrZyz0DrJxgg7fSX6M_0bxOa-JOidmGuJIwScciT1b5IVvvcQi3hx4UMwRQFunq1j2T7iRCT_LB99oP480KtoSXyCUS3dDzj6wCp4BEHb5K792isg" > > , > > "expires_in": 300, > > "refresh_expires_in": 1800, > > "refresh_token": > > > > > "eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCIgOiAiSldUIiwia2lkIiA6ICJhNmQzZTgzZi1iZGUxLTQ3YjgtYmQ4Yy1hMjVhNDdjMmExZTYifQ.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.WTW9TwMnx4DSzRlLkDj_uXgabFAAUD4wDB5D084GMdY" > > , > > "token_type": "bearer", > > "not-before-policy": 0, > > "session_state": "72ecb798-db58-4161-8e09-4aaedb2eab8f", > > "scope": "profile email" > > } > > > > But, we'd like to send a "non-JWT" token, like this one: > > { > > > > "access_token": "laskddjfnasdf7-fas45nfdsa-56kr-8uy7-fasd87fyasdf", > > "token_type": "bearer", > > "expires_in": 3600, > > "scope": "scope-1 scope-2 scope-n" > > } > > > > We're not very experienced in Keycloak and we do not know if this is > even > > possible, but any help will make us very happy. > > > > Thanks in advance! > > > > Regards, > > _______________________________________________ > > keycloak-user mailing list > > keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user > > > _______________________________________________ > keycloak-user mailing list > keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user > -- "Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett