Keycloak come under Apache license 2. According to Apache License The *Apache License* is a permissive > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permissive_free_software_licence> free > software license <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software_license> > written by the Apache Software Foundation > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Software_Foundation> (ASF).[5] > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_License#cite_note-nmr-permissive-5> > The Apache License, Version 2.0 requires preservation of the copyright > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright> notice and disclaimer > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disclaimer>;. Like other free software > licenses <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software_license>;, *the > license allows the user of the software the freedom to use the software for > any purpose, to distribute it, to modify it, and to distribute modified > versions of the software, under the terms of the license, without concern > for royalties <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royalties>*. This makes > ALv2 a FRAND-RF > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasonable_and_non-discriminatory_licensing... > license. The ASF and its projects release the software they produce under > the Apache License and many non-ASF projects are also using the ALv2. > So no need to buy the license by client. On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 12:00 AM vandana thota <vandana0242(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > Hello > > Is it must to buy keycloak license by client ? > > > Thanks, > Vandana > _______________________________________________ > keycloak-user mailing list > keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user > -- Subodh Chandra Joshi subodh1_joshi82(a)yahoo.co.in http://www.trendsinnews.com

Yes, it is. On Fri, 8 Jun 2018, 00:20 vandana thota, <vandana0242(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > So keycloak is free to use ? > > > Thanks, > Vandana > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 1:40 PM, Subodh Joshi <subodhcjoshi82(a)gmail.com&gt; > wrote: > >> Keycloak come under Apache license 2. According to Apache License >> >> The *Apache License* is a permissive >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permissive_free_software_licence> free >>> software license <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software_license> >>> written by the Apache Software Foundation >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Software_Foundation> (ASF).[5] >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_License#cite_note-nmr-permissive-5> >>> The Apache License, Version 2.0 requires preservation of the copyright >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright> notice and disclaimer >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disclaimer>;. Like other free software >>> licenses <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software_license>;, *the >>> license allows the user of the software the freedom to use the software for >>> any purpose, to distribute it, to modify it, and to distribute modified >>> versions of the software, under the terms of the license, without concern >>> for royalties <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royalties>*. This makes >>> ALv2 a FRAND-RF >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasonable_and_non-discriminatory_licensing... >>> license. The ASF and its projects release the software they produce under >>> the Apache License and many non-ASF projects are also using the ALv2. >>> >> >> So no need to buy the license by client. >> >> On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 12:00 AM vandana thota <vandana0242(a)gmail.com&gt; >> wrote: >> >>> Hello >>> >>> Is it must to buy keycloak license by client ? >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Vandana >>> _______________________________________________ >>> keycloak-user mailing list >>> keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user >>> >> >> >> -- >> Subodh Chandra Joshi >> subodh1_joshi82(a)yahoo.co.in >> http://www.trendsinnews.com >> > >

Keycloak is completely free to use. There's some limitations to that of course. Limited (no guaranteed) support. We expect the community to help out answering questions and fixing issues. No backporting of fixes or CVEs to previous versions. Etc. If you want enterprise level support Red Hat provides that through Red Hat Single Sign-On, which is our productized and fully supported build of Keycloak. On 7 June 2018 at 20:52, vandana thota <vandana0242(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > ok thanks . > > So you are working as keycloak admin support ? > > > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Subodh Joshi <subodhcjoshi82(a)gmail.com&gt; > wrote: > > > Yes, it is. > > > > On Fri, 8 Jun 2018, 00:20 vandana thota, <vandana0242(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > > > >> So keycloak is free to use ? > >> > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Vandana > >> > >> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 1:40 PM, Subodh Joshi <subodhcjoshi82(a)gmail.com > > > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Keycloak come under Apache license 2. According to Apache License > >>> > >>> The *Apache License* is a permissive > >>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permissive_free_software_licence> > free > >>>> software license <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki > /Free_software_license> > >>>> written by the Apache Software Foundation > >>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Software_Foundation> (ASF).[5] > >>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_License#cite_note-nmr- > permissive-5> > >>>> The Apache License, Version 2.0 requires preservation of the > copyright > >>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright> notice and disclaimer > >>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disclaimer>;. Like other free software > >>>> licenses <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software_license>;, *the > >>>> license allows the user of the software the freedom to use the > software for > >>>> any purpose, to distribute it, to modify it, and to distribute > modified > >>>> versions of the software, under the terms of the license, without > concern > >>>> for royalties <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royalties>*. This makes > >>>> ALv2 a FRAND-RF > >>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasonable_and_non-discrimina > tory_licensing> > >>>> license. The ASF and its projects release the software they produce > under > >>>> the Apache License and many non-ASF projects are also using the ALv2. > >>>> > >>> > >>> So no need to buy the license by client. > >>> > >>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 12:00 AM vandana thota <vandana0242(a)gmail.com&gt; > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hello > >>>> > >>>> Is it must to buy keycloak license by client ? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Vandana > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> keycloak-user mailing list > >>>> keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org > >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Subodh Chandra Joshi > >>> subodh1_joshi82(a)yahoo.co.in > >>> http://www.trendsinnews.com > >>> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ > keycloak-user mailing list > keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user >

We recommend installing Keycloak using the standalone distribution rather than deploy on top of existing WildFly server. If you want one for non-prod and one for prod is up to you. Usually it's good practice to have one for either. On 7 June 2018 at 22:06, vandana thota <vandana0242(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > Thanks for the information , > > I have installed keycloak on wildfly 11 server . Our wildfly server > has three standalone instances. It's non -prod, Dev environment. > > Do I have to install keycloak on wildfly server or install it on > separate VM > > Do I need to install keycloak on a separate VM for prod widlfy server > and another saparate VM for Non-prod Wildfly server ? > > Which is the best option > > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 2:18 PM, Stian Thorgersen <sthorger(a)redhat.com&gt; > wrote: > >> Keycloak is completely free to use. There's some limitations to that of >> course. Limited (no guaranteed) support. We expect the community to help >> out answering questions and fixing issues. No backporting of fixes or CVEs >> to previous versions. Etc. >> >> If you want enterprise level support Red Hat provides that through Red >> Hat Single Sign-On, which is our productized and fully supported build of >> Keycloak. >> >> On 7 June 2018 at 20:52, vandana thota <vandana0242(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >> >>> ok thanks . >>> >>> So you are working as keycloak admin support ? >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Subodh Joshi <subodhcjoshi82(a)gmail.com&gt; >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Yes, it is. >>> > >>> > On Fri, 8 Jun 2018, 00:20 vandana thota, <vandana0242(a)gmail.com&gt; >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >> So keycloak is free to use ? >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Thanks, >>> >> Vandana >>> >> >>> >> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 1:40 PM, Subodh Joshi < >>> subodhcjoshi82(a)gmail.com&gt; >>> >> wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> Keycloak come under Apache license 2. According to Apache License >>> >>> >>> >>> The *Apache License* is a permissive >>> >>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permissive_free_software_licence> >>> free >>> >>>> software license < >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software_license> >>> >>>> written by the Apache Software Foundation >>> >>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Software_Foundation> >>> (ASF).[5] >>> >>>> < >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_License#cite_note-nmr-permissive-5 >>> > >>> >>>> The Apache License, Version 2.0 requires preservation of the >>> copyright >>> >>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright> notice and disclaimer >>> >>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disclaimer>;. Like other free >>> software >>> >>>> licenses <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software_license>;, >>> *the >>> >>>> license allows the user of the software the freedom to use the >>> software for >>> >>>> any purpose, to distribute it, to modify it, and to distribute >>> modified >>> >>>> versions of the software, under the terms of the license, without >>> concern >>> >>>> for royalties <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royalties>*. This >>> makes >>> >>>> ALv2 a FRAND-RF >>> >>>> < >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasonable_and_non-discriminatory_licensing >>> > >>> >>>> license. The ASF and its projects release the software they >>> produce under >>> >>>> the Apache License and many non-ASF projects are also using the >>> ALv2. >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> So no need to buy the license by client. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 12:00 AM vandana thota < >>> vandana0242(a)gmail.com&gt; >>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Hello >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Is it must to buy keycloak license by client ? >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Thanks, >>> >>>> Vandana >>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>>> keycloak-user mailing list >>> >>>> keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org >>> >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Subodh Chandra Joshi >>> >>> subodh1_joshi82(a)yahoo.co.in >>> >>> http://www.trendsinnews.com >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> keycloak-user mailing list >>> keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user >>> >> >> >