7:30 p.m.
Hi guys,
I have created a little github project to make keycloak.js available to bower
package manager <http://bower.io/>;.
Project here:
https://github.com/smysnk/keycloak-adapter-bower
Usage:
$ bower install keycloak
- Josh
9:13 p.m.
Cool thanks. What is bower used for?
On 6/20/2014 1:30 PM, Josh wrote:
Hi guys,
I have created a little github project to make keycloak.js available to
bower package manager <http://bower.io/>;.
Project here:
https://github.com/smysnk/keycloak-adapter-bower
Usage:
$ bower install keycloak
- Josh
_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing list
keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
9:20 p.m.
Great, thanks Josh!
@Bill: Bower is a bit like maven for java script. It basically manages your
dependencies.
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Bill Burke <bburke(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Cool thanks. What is bower used for?
On 6/20/2014 1:30 PM, Josh wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I have created a little github project to make keycloak.js available to
> bower package manager <http://bower.io/>;.
>
> Project here:
> https://github.com/smysnk/keycloak-adapter-bower
>
> Usage:
> $ bower install keycloak
>
> - Josh
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-user mailing list
> keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
>
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing list
keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
10:40 a.m.
Hi Josh,
That's great - thanks for contributing this. I would like to transfer this to
https://github.com/keycloak though, I hope your happy with that.
Thanks,
Stian
----- Original Message -----
From: "Josh" <smysnk(a)gmail.com>
To: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Friday, 20 June, 2014 6:30:02 PM
Subject: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
Hi guys,
I have created a little github project to make keycloak.js available to bower
package manager .
Project here:
https://github.com/smysnk/keycloak-adapter-bower
Usage:
$ bower install keycloak
- Josh
_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing list
keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
8:56 p.m.
You bet, I actually had the thought that it would be better as part of the
release cycle. I'll have to figure out how to transfer bower repositories
because there was no login required to register a bower repo and currently
I have taken "keycloak" which would be optimal for the project.
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Stian Thorgersen <stian(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi Josh,
That's great - thanks for contributing this. I would like to transfer this
to https://github.com/keycloak though, I hope your happy with that.
Thanks,
Stian
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Josh" <smysnk(a)gmail.com>
> To: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Friday, 20 June, 2014 6:30:02 PM
> Subject: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I have created a little github project to make keycloak.js available to
bower
> package manager .
>
> Project here:
> https://github.com/smysnk/keycloak-adapter-bower
>
> Usage:
> $ bower install keycloak
>
> - Josh
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-user mailing list
> keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
11:38 p.m.
Looks like it's a manual process at the moment to get registry moved to a
different github endpont. Let me know when you have the project setup and
I'll contact the bower guys.
- Josh
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Josh <smysnk(a)gmail.com> wrote:
You bet, I actually had the thought that it would be better as part
of the
release cycle. I'll have to figure out how to transfer bower repositories
because there was no login required to register a bower repo and currently
I have taken "keycloak" which would be optimal for the project.
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Stian Thorgersen <stian(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> Hi Josh,
>
> That's great - thanks for contributing this. I would like to transfer
> this to https://github.com/keycloak though, I hope your happy with that.
>
> Thanks,
> Stian
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Josh" <smysnk(a)gmail.com>
> > To: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> > Sent: Friday, 20 June, 2014 6:30:02 PM
> > Subject: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
> >
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I have created a little github project to make keycloak.js available to
> bower
> > package manager .
> >
> > Project here:
> > https://github.com/smysnk/keycloak-adapter-bower
> >
> > Usage:
> > $ bower install keycloak
> >
> > - Josh
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > keycloak-user mailing list
> > keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
>
3:08 p.m.
I've pulled in your stuff to https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower
I'd prefer the versions to match with Keycloak versions (1.0-beta-2, 1.0-beta-3,
1.0-final). Do you know if that'll be a problem?
Also, I'm going to add minification of keycloak.js to our Maven build. We'll need
it there as well + we're mainly Java/Maven guys ;)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Josh" <smysnk(a)gmail.com>
To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
Cc: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Monday, 23 June, 2014 10:38:44 PM
Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
Looks like it's a manual process at the moment to get registry moved to a
different github endpont. Let me know when you have the project setup and
I'll contact the bower guys.
- Josh
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Josh <smysnk(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> You bet, I actually had the thought that it would be better as part of the
> release cycle. I'll have to figure out how to transfer bower repositories
> because there was no login required to register a bower repo and currently
> I have taken "keycloak" which would be optimal for the project.
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Stian Thorgersen <stian(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Josh,
>>
>> That's great - thanks for contributing this. I would like to transfer
>> this to https://github.com/keycloak though, I hope your happy with that.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Stian
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Josh" <smysnk(a)gmail.com>
>> > To: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
>> > Sent: Friday, 20 June, 2014 6:30:02 PM
>> > Subject: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
>> >
>> > Hi guys,
>> >
>> > I have created a little github project to make keycloak.js available to
>> bower
>> > package manager .
>> >
>> > Project here:
>> > https://github.com/smysnk/keycloak-adapter-bower
>> >
>> > Usage:
>> > $ bower install keycloak
>> >
>> > - Josh
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > keycloak-user mailing list
>> > keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
>>
>
>
5:46 p.m.
I do think there is a problem using that version format, I think I tried it
originally and bower was having none of it. This could be because they use
version for auto upgrade purposes, where one can use a "~" character to
prefix the version to allow upgrades in version minors in the bower.json
file.
eg.
"dependencies": {
"keycloak": "~0.3.12"
},
I have to admit I've been pulled to the dark side a little bit, it do enjoy
npm / bower for doing javascript type build processes (sometimes a
necessary evil). I was never a a fan of 'grunt' but found that 'gulp' is
much better. I have a hybrid build process in my java apps where I
sometimes break out of maven to execute some gulp build processes.
But I understand for project like keycloak 'npm / gulp' adds a lot of
complexity to build process and is not desirable.
I'll talk to the bower guys to get keycloak switched over to your fork :D
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Stian Thorgersen <stian(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I've pulled in your stuff to
https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower
I'd prefer the versions to match with Keycloak versions (1.0-beta-2,
1.0-beta-3, 1.0-final). Do you know if that'll be a problem?
Also, I'm going to add minification of keycloak.js to our Maven build.
We'll need it there as well + we're mainly Java/Maven guys ;)
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Josh" <smysnk(a)gmail.com>
> To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Monday, 23 June, 2014 10:38:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
>
> Looks like it's a manual process at the moment to get registry moved to a
> different github endpont. Let me know when you have the project setup
and
> I'll contact the bower guys.
>
> - Josh
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Josh <smysnk(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > You bet, I actually had the thought that it would be better as part of
the
> > release cycle. I'll have to figure out how to transfer bower
repositories
> > because there was no login required to register a bower repo and
currently
> > I have taken "keycloak" which would be optimal for the project.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Stian Thorgersen <stian(a)redhat.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Josh,
> >>
> >> That's great - thanks for contributing this. I would like to transfer
> >> this to https://github.com/keycloak though, I hope your happy with
that.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Stian
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> > From: "Josh" <smysnk(a)gmail.com>
> >> > To: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> >> > Sent: Friday, 20 June, 2014 6:30:02 PM
> >> > Subject: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
> >> >
> >> > Hi guys,
> >> >
> >> > I have created a little github project to make keycloak.js
available to
> >> bower
> >> > package manager .
> >> >
> >> > Project here:
> >> > https://github.com/smysnk/keycloak-adapter-bower
> >> >
> >> > Usage:
> >> > $ bower install keycloak
> >> >
> >> > - Josh
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > keycloak-user mailing list
> >> > keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
> >>
> >
> >
>
1:10 p.m.
Have you contacted the Bower guys to get this changed yet?
By the way we're going to stick with the same versioning that we use for Keycloak
except we'll remove -final from the final release. So versions would be:
1.0-beta4
1.0-rc1
1.0
That should mean that versions such as ">=1.0" will work, and will only use
stable versions, while if someone wants to use a beta or rc they can explicitly specify
the version.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Josh" <smysnk(a)gmail.com>
To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
Cc: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Thursday, 3 July, 2014 4:46:09 PM
Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
I do think there is a problem using that version format, I think I tried it
originally and bower was having none of it. This could be because they use
version for auto upgrade purposes, where one can use a "~" character to
prefix the version to allow upgrades in version minors in the bower.json
file.
eg.
"dependencies": {
"keycloak": "~0.3.12"
},
I have to admit I've been pulled to the dark side a little bit, it do enjoy
npm / bower for doing javascript type build processes (sometimes a
necessary evil). I was never a a fan of 'grunt' but found that 'gulp'
is
much better. I have a hybrid build process in my java apps where I
sometimes break out of maven to execute some gulp build processes.
But I understand for project like keycloak 'npm / gulp' adds a lot of
complexity to build process and is not desirable.
I'll talk to the bower guys to get keycloak switched over to your fork :D
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Stian Thorgersen <stian(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> I've pulled in your stuff to https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower
>
> I'd prefer the versions to match with Keycloak versions (1.0-beta-2,
> 1.0-beta-3, 1.0-final). Do you know if that'll be a problem?
>
> Also, I'm going to add minification of keycloak.js to our Maven build.
> We'll need it there as well + we're mainly Java/Maven guys ;)
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Josh" <smysnk(a)gmail.com>
> > To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
> > Cc: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> > Sent: Monday, 23 June, 2014 10:38:44 PM
> > Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
> >
> > Looks like it's a manual process at the moment to get registry moved to a
> > different github endpont. Let me know when you have the project setup
> and
> > I'll contact the bower guys.
> >
> > - Josh
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Josh <smysnk(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > You bet, I actually had the thought that it would be better as part of
> the
> > > release cycle. I'll have to figure out how to transfer bower
> repositories
> > > because there was no login required to register a bower repo and
> currently
> > > I have taken "keycloak" which would be optimal for the project.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Stian Thorgersen
<stian(a)redhat.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Josh,
> > >>
> > >> That's great - thanks for contributing this. I would like to
transfer
> > >> this to https://github.com/keycloak though, I hope your happy with
> that.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Stian
> > >>
> > >> ----- Original Message -----
> > >> > From: "Josh" <smysnk(a)gmail.com>
> > >> > To: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> > >> > Sent: Friday, 20 June, 2014 6:30:02 PM
> > >> > Subject: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
> > >> >
> > >> > Hi guys,
> > >> >
> > >> > I have created a little github project to make keycloak.js
> available to
> > >> bower
> > >> > package manager .
> > >> >
> > >> > Project here:
> > >> > https://github.com/smysnk/keycloak-adapter-bower
> > >> >
> > >> > Usage:
> > >> > $ bower install keycloak
> > >> >
> > >> > - Josh
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > _______________________________________________
> > >> > keycloak-user mailing list
> > >> > keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> > >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
3574
days inactive
3598
days old
8 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Bill Burke -
Josh -
Nils Preusker -
Stian Thorgersen