4:13 a.m.
Hello everyone. I've been a Resteasy user for a long time, but never a contributor.
I was looking for the Http Client lib used by Resteasy internally, and found out that it
uses Apache Http Client by default, and also provides a few other engines.
I was wondering if having a new implementation that uses the new Java 11 Http Client would
make sense and, if so, what would be some general guidelines besides implementing a new
engine.
6:43 p.m.
Hi Rinaldo,
First of all I'd like to apologize for the late reply. For some reason this did not
come through to my inbox.
This is definitely something we've thought about. We can'd use it by default as it
requires Java 11 and we still compile down to Java 8. However we are looking at the
prospect of defaulting to possibly a Vert.x client.
If we can get to a point where we can require a minimum of Java 11 I definitely think we
should look at this option.
--
James R. Perkins
7:54 p.m.
I suggest writing a new engine. You really only need to take an existing
engine and make modifications.
RESTEasy has quite a few engine impls. You can find them with this search
string "*Engine*.java".
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 12:44 PM James Perkins <jperkins(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi Rinaldo,
First of all I'd like to apologize for the late reply. For some reason
this did not come through to my inbox.
This is definitely something we've thought about. We can'd use it by
default as it requires Java 11 and we still compile down to Java 8. However
we are looking at the prospect of defaulting to possibly a Vert.x client.
If we can get to a point where we can require a minimum of Java 11 I
definitely think we should look at this option.
--
James R. Perkins
_______________________________________________
resteasy mailing list -- resteasy(a)lists.jboss.org
To unsubscribe send an email to resteasy-leave(a)lists.jboss.org
933
days inactive
1004
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
James Perkins -
Rebecca Searls -
Rinaldo Pitzer Júnior