Yes, Undertow should respect the redirect response code.
Stuart
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 10:43 AM, electrotype <electrotype(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I see some people think the HTTP request for a WebSocket upgrade shouldn't
honnor 301/302 redirects. But the spec seems to say it is ok:
"If the status code received from the server is not 101, the
client handles the response per HTTP [RFC2616] procedures. In
particular, the client might perform authentication if it
receives a 401 status code; the server might redirect the client
using a 3xx status code (but clients are not required to follow
them), etc. Otherwise, proceed as follows."
"The server MAY redirect the client using a 3xx status code
[RFC2616]. Note that this step can happen together with, before,
or after the optional authentication step described above."
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6455
In the version of Undertow I use, 1.2.12.Final, I see that the redirect
response is handled by org.xnio.http.HttpUpgrade :
private void handleRedirect(final HttpUpgradeParser parser) {
List<String> location = parser.getHeaders().get("location");
future.setException(new RedirectException(msg.redirect(),
parser.getResponseCode(), location == null ? null : location.get(0)));
}
Is it the same behavior in most recent Undertow releases?
Related discussion:
https://github.com/sta/websocket-sharp/issues/42
Thanks,
Julien
_______________________________________________
undertow-dev mailing list
undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev