Re: [undertow-dev] WebSocket sending back pressure

There is also a flush method on the channel if it's helpful. > On Jul 7, 2016, at 7:10 AM, peter royal <peter.royal(a)pobox.com&gt; wrote: > > I looked some more and cancellation would be a huge change - I'm going > to see how far I can get by using the existing callback for flow > control. > > -pete > > -- > (peter.royal|osi)(a)pobox.com - http://fotap.org/~osi > >> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016, at 09:43 PM, Stuart Douglas wrote: >> Some of the methods take a WebSocketCallback that will notify you on >> completion or error, however at the moment there is no way to cancel a >> message. >> >> Stuart >> >> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 6:56 AM, peter royal <peter.royal(a)pobox.com&gt; >> wrote: >>> I am finding that sometimes I have WebSocket connections that are unable >>> to flush messages out the socket at the rate I am generating messages. >>> >>> I'm using the core.WebSockets class to send messages. Is it possible to >>> achieve this with what exists currently? My initial guess is no.. >>> conceptually it would be nice for core.WebSockets to return a >>> CompletableFuture-style object that would let me get a callback when the >>> message is sent, or have the ability to cancel it if it is still sitting >>> in the send queue. >>> >>> I'm happy to help build something into Undertow if it is a welcome >>> addition. >>> >>> -pete >>> >>> -- >>> (peter.royal|osi)(a)pobox.com - http://fotap.org/~osi >>> _______________________________________________ >>> undertow-dev mailing list >>> undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev > _______________________________________________ > undertow-dev mailing list > undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev